5
$\begingroup$

I'm still a bit lost in my studies of rotation numbers. Any help is much appreciated!

Let's say we have a homeomorphism $F: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ which is a lift of a homeomorphism $f:S^1 \rightarrow S^1$ of the circle. The homeo $f$ is assumed to be orientation preserving, i.e. $F(x+1) = F(x) +1$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$.

The rotation number $$ \rho(F,x) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{F^n(x) - x}{n} $$ exists for every $x \in \mathbb{R}$ and is constant, i.e. $\rho(F,x) = \rho(F,y)$ for all $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$. Let $F^{-1}$ be the inverse of $F$. I know that $\rho(F^{-1},x)$ also exists for every $x \in \mathbb{R}$. What I want to show now is that $$ \rho(F,x) + \rho(F^{-1},x) = 0 \quad\text{for all } x \in \mathbb{R}. $$ Somehow I am still stuck. What I managed so far was to calculate $$ \frac{F^n(x) - x}{n} = -\frac{x - F^n(x)}{n} = -\frac{F^{-n} \circ F^n(x) - F^n(x)}{n}. $$ This almost looks like a solution to me since if I can show that if the right hand side $\frac{F^{-n} \circ F^n(x) - F^n(x)}{n}$ converges to $\rho(F^{-1},x)$ for $n \rightarrow \infty$, I am done. I know already that this term is convergent because the left hand side is convergent. I also now that for every fixed $k \in \mathbb{N}$ the term $$ \frac{F^{-n} \circ F^k(x) - F^k(x)}{n} \quad\text{converges to } \rho(F^{-1}) \text{ for } n \rightarrow \infty. $$

Meh, I'm lost. Sorry if this is a stupid question.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Lemma: If $f,g:S^1\to S^1$ are two orientation-preserving homeomorphisms and $f\circ g=g\circ f$, then $\rho(f\circ g)=\rho(f)+ \rho(g) (\mod 1)$ (This is an exercise from Barreira & Valls' Dynamical Systems: an Introduction, p. 84).

Proof of Lemma: Since $f,g$ are orientation-preserving, there are lifts $F,G:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}:F \uparrow,G\uparrow$ of $f,g$, respectively. Since $f,g$ commute, so do $F,G$: Let $\pi:\mathbb{R}\to S^1$ be the projection. Then $F\circ G=\pi^{-1}\circ f\circ \pi \circ \pi^{-1} \circ g\circ \pi=\pi^{-1} \circ f\circ g \circ \pi=\pi^{-1}\circ g\circ f\circ \pi=G\circ F$.

$F\circ G$ is a lift of $f\circ g$ and it is increasing. Hence $\rho(F\circ G)$ is defined. Then $\rho(F\circ G)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\dfrac{(F\circ G)^n(x)-x}{n}= \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\dfrac{F^n(G^n(x))-G^n(x)}{n}+\dfrac{G^n(x)-x}{n}\right)= \rho(F)+\rho(G)$ since the used limits exist independently of $x\in\mathbb{R}$. Also note that in the second equality we use the fact that $F,G$ commute.

Finally since by definition $\rho(f)=\pi(\rho(F))$, modding the acquired equality by $1$, we are done (Admittedly we won't be using the complete form of the lemma, but I figured I should record it completely for future reference.).


Turning back to your question, we have an orientation-preserving homeomorphism $f:S^1\to S^1$. Let $F$ be an increasing lift of $f$. Then we have $f\circ f^{-1}=1_{S^1}=f^{-1}\circ f$ and $1_{\mathbb{R}}$ is a lift of $1_{S^1}$. As $f$ and its inverse commute, we may employ the above lemma. Noting that $\rho(1_{\mathbb{R}})=0$, as (again) the limit in the definition of the rotation number is independent of $x$, the result follows.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Intuitively, $F$ is a homeomorphism so $F^{-1}$ should exist and it should "rotate" in the opposite direction of $F$.

Can you possibly show $\rho(G \circ F,x) = \rho(F,x) + \rho(G, F(x)) $ ?


Maybe easier, let $y_n = F^{-n}(x)$ since $F$ is a homeomorphism there is only one point like this:

$$ \frac{ F^{-n}(x) - x} {n} = \frac{ y_n - F^n(y_n)}{n} \to \rho(F, y_n)$$

Unfortunately, you don't know much about except possibly: $y_n \approx x - n \rho(F^{-1}, x)$.

Maybe you can get uniform convergence to $\rho(F, \cdot)$ since $S^1$ is compact?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The general formula $\rho(G \circ F) = \rho(F)+\rho(G)$ is not true, there are lots of counterexamples. Uniform convergence is true (and makes your second argument work), but not really because of compactness. $\endgroup$ – Lukas Geyer Sep 8 '14 at 13:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.