I was assigned to show that every Sylow 2-subgroups in $S_4$ is isomorphic to $D_4$.
So I figured, since $|S_4|=24=2^3\cdot 3$, every Sylow 2-subgroup has either the form:
$\langle (a_{1}a_{2}),(a_{3}a_{4}a_{5}a_{6})\rangle$
or:
$\langle(a_{1}a_{2})(a_{3}a_{4}),(a_{5}a_{6}a_{7}a_{8})\rangle$
(where $a_{i}\in\left\{ 1234 \right\}$ all distinct in a permutation).
To my big surprise, I found out that it is not true that for every choice of $\sigma=(a_1a_2)$ and $\tau=(a_3a_4a_5a_6)$, the group $\langle\sigma, \tau\rangle$ forms a Sylow 2-subgroup...
For example, $\langle(12),(1234)\rangle=\langle(23),(1234)\rangle=S_4$, where, on the other hand, $\langle(13),(1234)\rangle$ does form a subgroup of $S_4$, isomorphic to $D_4$ (it is of order 8 and all relations hold).
First of all, I am curious about why does it matter which $\sigma$ do I choose (does it also matter which $\tau$ do I choose?), does it have anything to do with the reflection symmetry? because when looking at a square with vertices numbered 1,2,3,4:
there's a big difference between $(12)$ and $(13)$, and between $(12)(34)$ and $(13)(24)$
Does it have anything to do with that?
This leads me to my second, less important question: considering all the above, how can I wisely choose $\sigma$ and $\tau$? or do I have to try all possible $\sigma$'s and $\tau$'s?