Upper bound for the sum $ \sum_{k=1}^N \frac{1}{\varphi(k)}$ Is there an upper bound for the sum
$$
\sum_{k=1}^N \frac{1}{\varphi^{\alpha}(k)}
$$
where $\varphi(n)$ is the Euler totient function and $\alpha\geq 1$ a real constant?
In particular, I'm interested in the cases $\alpha=1$.
I don't want any asymptotic estimate with error term, since in that case there is already a good reference from Sitaramachandrarao (http://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.rmjm/1250127232).
I'd like to have a reasonable bound like
$$
\sum_{k=1}^N \frac{1}{\varphi(k)} \le f(N)\;,
$$
for a certain function $f$, maybe with a range of validity like $\forall N\ge n_0$, for a certain integer $n_0$.
 A: Wikipedia gives $$\sum_{k=1}^n{1\over\phi(k)}={315\zeta(3)\over2\pi^4}\left(\log n+\gamma-\sum_p{\log p\over p^2-p+1}\right)+O\left({(\log n)^{2/3}\over n}\right)$$ with a link to R. Sitaramachandrarao. On an error term of Landau II, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 15 (1985), 579-588. 
A: A trivial bound can be find in this way. Using$$\frac{1}{\varphi\left(n\right)}<2e^{\gamma}\frac{\log\left(\log\left(n\right)\right)}{n},\,\forall n>2$$
 where $\gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant, we have, $\forall\alpha>1$
 $$\sum_{n=1}^{N}\frac{1}{\varphi\left(n\right)^{\alpha}}<2^{\alpha}e^{\gamma\alpha}\sum_{n\geq1}\left(\frac{\log\left(\log\left(n\right)\right)}{n}\right)^{\alpha}<2^{\alpha}e^{\gamma\alpha}\zeta\left(\alpha(1-\epsilon)\right)$$
 where $\zeta\left(*\right)$
  is the Riemann Zeta function.
A: If you use the estimate
$\forall n\in \mathbb{N} |n\ge 1$    $  \sqrt{\frac{n}{2}}\le\phi(n)\le n$ (which can be proved elementarily)
, then , by taking the inverses, you can see by the confront principle that if $0< a\le 1$ then the series $\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{1}{\phi(n)^a} $ diverges, so your succession is unbounded, while if a>2 , since the series $\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}^a} $ converges (a>2 => a/2>1), then the series $\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{1}{\phi(n)^a} $ converges, and is  $\le$ $2^\frac{a}{2} \sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{1}{n^\frac{a}{2}} $ (and thus so is your succession). This leads uncovered the case $1<a\le 2$.
