1
$\begingroup$

Let $ v \in V$ be a unit vector in a Euclidean vector space. Prove that the endomorphism $$\phi: V \to V, \qquad \phi(x)=x - 2<x,v> v$$ is a reflection.

I know that a reflection is an orthogonal transformation with determinant = -1. I tried proving that the above mapping preserves lengths by showing that $<\phi(x), \phi(y)> = <x,y>$ but my attempts have failed.I feel like I'm missing something.

A hint would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Hint: Write $V=\langle v\rangle\oplus \langle v\rangle^\perp$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Thanks for the hint. This is what I've got: Since $V=\langle v\rangle\oplus \langle v\rangle^\perp$, we can write any vector $x \in V$ uniquely as some linear combination $ x = \alpha v + \sum_{i=1}^r \beta_i w_i $ where $\langle v\rangle^\perp = \langle w_1,...,w_r \rangle$ for an orthonormal basis $(w_1,...,w_r)$. Then the effect of $\phi$ on x is the following $$ \phi(x) = ... = - \alpha v + \sum_{i=1}^r \beta_i w_i $$ using the fact that $w_i$ and $v$ are orthogonal and that $v$ is a unit vector in the intermediate steps. Then we can see that $\phi(v)=-v$ and $\phi( w_i )= w_i$ for all $i$. From this it follows that the matrix of $\phi$ in the orthonormal basis $(v,w_1,...,w_r)$ of V is given by $diag(-1,1,...,1)$, which is clearly orthogonal with determinant -1.

Is the proof correct?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's fine with me. However, it is not even necessary to use a base and argue with matrices ... $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20, 2014 at 19:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .