0
$\begingroup$

I would be happy if someone could give me a hand with this practice problem.

Given $f$ is continuous in the interval $[0, \infty)$, and $f(0) = \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x) = 0$, prove or disprove: $f$ attains a maximum and a minimum in the interval $[0, \infty)$.

Now, I approached this by creating a closed interval $[0,n]$, inside which $f$ is continuous. So by Weierstrass's second theorem I know that $f$ gets max/min values inside it. Now, if I'm given that the limit is zero when $x$ goes to $\infty$, I know that for any $\epsilon > 0$ , there exists $n>0$ such that, for any $x>n$, $|f(x)-0| < \epsilon \implies |f(x)| < \epsilon$.

I'm having trouble showing exactly how $f$ gets minimal or maximal values in the interval $[n, \infty)$. Also, I'm having trouble explaining how $f(0) = 0$ helps me define a minimal/maximal value when $x$ goes to $\infty$.

Thanks for any help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ yes thats right sorry, was a misstype. $\endgroup$ – user2970357 Jun 16 '14 at 20:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've added LaTeX code for the math in your question while also correcting grammatical and spelling errors I saw along the way. Take a look at the code to get a feel for how to write up questions in a readable way on Math.SE. For a more thorough reference regarding math syntax on this site, see this quick guide. $\endgroup$ – Dan Jun 16 '14 at 20:34
3
$\begingroup$

For a maximum: If $f(x)\le0$ for all $x$, there's nothing to show (the maximum value is $f(0)=0$). Otherwise, $f(c)=\alpha>0$ for some $c>0$. Choose $N>c$ so that $f(x)<\alpha/2$ for all $x\ge N$. This can be done since $\lim\limits_{x\rightarrow\infty} f(x)=0$.

Now, $f$ attains a maximum value on $[0,N]$. Show that this in fact is the global maximum value of $f$ (note the maximum value on $[0,N]$ is at least $\alpha$).

Argue in a similar manner to show $f$ attains a minimum value.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thumbs up! that helped alot, cheers! $\endgroup$ – user2970357 Jun 16 '14 at 20:46
  • $\begingroup$ one last thing, as for maximum it's clear , as my maximum in [0,N] >= eps, and when x>n f(x) < eps/2 for all x. what about min value? the min i chose for f(c) dosn't contradict f(x) < epsilon so arguing the same thing dosn't work for min case. I must be missing somthing $\endgroup$ – user2970357 Jun 16 '14 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ @user2970357 For the min: If $f(x)\ge0$ for all $x$, we're done. Otherwise, choose $c>0$ with $f(c)=\alpha<0$. Choose $N>c$ so that $f(x)>\alpha/2$ for $x\ge N$... (Alternatively, $g=-f$ has a maximum value; this will be the minimum value of $f$.) $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jun 16 '14 at 21:07
  • $\begingroup$ very nice and elegant, thanks $\endgroup$ – user2970357 Jun 16 '14 at 21:13
0
$\begingroup$

Hint: take a look at the functions $f_1(x) = \frac{1}{x+1}$ and $f_2(x) = -\frac{1}{x+1}$. Does $f_1$ reach it's minimum? How about $f_2$, does it achieve its maximum?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your functions are not $0$ at $0$. (Not that it really matters too much). $\endgroup$ – davidlowryduda Jun 16 '14 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ well f1 wont reach a min value as x goes to inf, but f will have an infimum = 0, .. f2 gets a suprimum for x goes to inf but no maximum $\endgroup$ – user2970357 Jun 16 '14 at 20:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.