15
$\begingroup$

I want to prove that if I omit the fact that $\mu (X) < \infty$ in Egorov theorem and place instead that our functions $|f_n| <g$ and $g$ is integrable, we still get the result of Egorov's theorem.

Fix $m$ a natural number.

I took $ w_{n} = |f_n-f|$ and thus by DCT $\int |f_{n} - f|$ goes to zero.

Then I took $\bigcup_n {( w_{n} \geq 1/m)}$. I need its measure to be finite. Its measure is less than the sum of the measures of each $ w_n\geq 1/m)$ varying $n$, and by Tchebychev, this is less than $m\int|f_{n} - f|$. But I got stuck here.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
11
+50
$\begingroup$

We can, without loss of generality, assume that the sequence $f_n$ is decreasing and convergent almost everywhere to $0$ (if it's not the case, consider $\displaystyle g_n(x):=\sup_{k\geq n}|f_n-f(x)|$, which is dominated by $2g$, an integrable function. We fix $\varepsilon>0$, and we are looking for a measurable set $A$ such that $\mu(X\setminus A)\leq \varepsilon$ and the sequence $\{f_n\}$ converges uniformly to $f$ on $A$. We have for all integers $j$ and $n$ that $$\mu\left(\left\{g_n\geq \frac 1j\right\}\right)\leq j\int_X |g_n|d\mu,$$ and the monotone convergence theorem gives us that $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\int_X |g_n|d\mu=0$. Hence for all $j\geq 1$, we can pick $n_j\in\mathbb N$ such that $$\mu\left(\left\{g_{n_j}\geq \frac 1j\right\}\right)\leq \varepsilon2^{-j}.$$ Now, put $A_j:=\left\{g_{n_j}\geq \frac 1j\right\}$ and $\displaystyle A:=\bigcap_{j\geq 1}\complement_X A_j$. We have $$\mu(X\setminus A)=\mu\left(\bigcup_{j\geq 1}A_j\right)\leq \sum_{j\geq 1}\mu(A_j)=\varepsilon\left(\frac 1{1-2^{-1}}-1\right)=\varepsilon$$ and $\displaystyle\sup_{x\in A}\,|g_{n_j}-0|\leq \frac 1j$. Since the sequence $\displaystyle\left\{\sup_{x\in A}\,g_n(x)\right\}$ is decreasing and has a sub-sequence which converges to $0$, the whole sequence converges to $0$, and we are done.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What does $\complement_X$ mean? $\endgroup$ – Sujaan Kunalan Apr 12 '15 at 17:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SujaanKunalan The complement in $X$. $\endgroup$ – Davide Giraudo Apr 12 '15 at 17:32
  • $\begingroup$ The complement of $A$ in $X$? $\endgroup$ – Sujaan Kunalan Apr 12 '15 at 17:34
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. ${}{}{}{} $ $\endgroup$ – Davide Giraudo Apr 12 '15 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ @YungBo: Instead of making a substantive edit to an old answer, you should address your proposed correction with a comment or (perhaps) post your own answer. $\endgroup$ – hardmath Jul 29 '16 at 17:07
1
$\begingroup$

Here is another solution:

We can write:

$$X=\{ g>1\}\cup(\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty}\left\{ 2^{-k}<g\leqslant2^{1-k}\right\})\cup \{g=0\}$$ Notice that the above sets are all disjoint.

Apply Egoroff's theorem to each of the sets: $$\{ g>1\},\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty}\left\{ 2^{-k}<g\leqslant2^{1-k}\right\}$$

Then there exist $A\subset G=\{g>1\}$ ,and $A_k\subset G_k=\left\{ 2^{-k}<g\leqslant2^{1-k}\right\}, $ such that: $$\mu (A)<\varepsilon/2 , \mu (A_k)<\varepsilon 4^{-k} $$ and $$f_n\longrightarrow f$$uniformly in $E^c=(G\setminus A)\cup(\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty}G_k\setminus A_k)\cup \{f_n=0,\forall n\}$, where the last set in the union is a superset of $\{g=0\}$.

Now, it suffices to prove that $\mu (E)<\varepsilon$.

Indeed, after some simple set calculations (using the fact that we decomposed X in disjoint sets) we can obtain that: $$E=X\setminus\left\{(G\setminus A)\cup(\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty}G_k\setminus A_k)\cup \{f_n=0,\forall n\}\right\}\subset$$ $$(X\setminus(G\setminus A))\cap(X\setminus(\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty}G_k\setminus A_k))\cap (X\setminus\{g=0\})\subset$$ $$A\cup(\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty} A_k)$$ Therefore, $$\mu (E)\leqslant \mu (A\cup(\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty} A_k))\leqslant \mu(A)+\mu (\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^{\infty} A_k))<\varepsilon/2+\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \varepsilon4^{-k} =\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/3 <\varepsilon$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain the last subset relation? I have no idea how it follows. $\endgroup$ – takecare Mar 5 '16 at 6:04
1
$\begingroup$

Let $\epsilon>0$ be given.

Define the sets $G_m := \{x: g(x)>1/m\}$. Since $\int g <\infty$, we have $\mu(G_m)<\infty$ for all $m$. For each $m$, apply Egoroff's Theorem to find a $E_m\subseteq G_m$ such that $\mu(E_m)=\epsilon/2^m$ and $f_n \to f$ uniformly on $G_m-E_m$.

Claim: Let $E=\cup_{m=1}^{\infty}E_m$ and we note that $\mu(E)\le \epsilon$. I claim that $f_n\to f$ uniformly on $X-E$.

Indeed, it suffices to show that for every given $k$, there exists $N$ such that $|f_n-f| < 2/k$ on $X-E$ for all $n\ge N$.

  • On $X-G_k$, we have $|f_n|,|f|\le g \le 1/k$ so $|f_n-f| < 2/k$ holds for every $n$.
  • On $G_k - E$, which is a subset of $G_k - E_k$, we have that $f_n \to f$ uniformly, so we simply pick $N$ sufficiently large.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.