4
$\begingroup$

We can state that, with $n$ integer,

$$\int_1^n \log x \ \mathrm{dx} \leq \sum_{m = 1}^n \log m$$

because the second is the area of $n$ rectangles with unity base, while the first is "just" the area under the function.

1) How can it analitically or geometrically be proved?

2) Can this be stated in any other case? Supposing that $f(x)$ is integrable, is it always true that

$$\int_1^n f(x) \ \mathrm{dx} \leq \sum_{m = 1}^n f(m)$$

?

Or what are the conditions under which that is true?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Concerning 2. I guess no: assume $f(x)=-\log(x)$... $\endgroup$
    – draks ...
    Commented Jun 12, 2014 at 10:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For "conditions" in 2: draw the graph of $\log x$, and the rectangles you refer to at the beginning of your question. I think you will find it pretty clear what feature of the graph ensures that the inequality holds. This gives a sufficient condition for 2 to be true. $\endgroup$
    – David
    Commented Jun 12, 2014 at 11:03

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

$$\large \underline{\texttt{Analytic Proof}}$$

Observe that $\log{x}$ is increasing.$(1)$

Observe that

$$\int\limits_{1}^{n}{\log x\, dx}=\int\limits_{1}^{2}{\log x \, dx}+\int\limits_{2}^{3}{\log x\, dx}+\cdots +\int\limits_{n-1}^{n}{\log x\, dx} \tag{2}$$

For an integrable function $f$, if $f(x)\le M \quad \forall x\in [a,b]$ then $$\int\limits_{a}^{b}{f(x) dx} \le M(b-a) \tag 3$$

Observe with the help of $(1)$ and $(3)$ that $$\int\limits_{m-1}^{m}{\log x\, dx}\le \log{m} \tag{4}$$

Using $(2)$ and $(4)$ see that $$\int\limits_{1}^{n}{\log x\, dx}\le \log 2+\log 3 +\cdots +\log n=\sum\limits_{m=1}^{n}\log m $$


$$\large \underline{\texttt{Geometric Proof}}$$

Recall that $\int\limits_{a}^{b}{f(x)}$ is defined as the area under the curve $f(x)$, now have a look at the graph below. Plot

Compare the area between $\log x$ and $x$ axis with the area of green region and $x$ axis to get a result. $(1)$ plays a role in our assumption about areas.

You can also see here for a graph.


$$\large \underline{\texttt{Conditions}}$$ If $f(x)$ is $\color{blue}{\text{increasing}}$ then the following is true $$\int\limits_1^n f(x) \ \mathrm{dx} \leq \sum\limits_{m = \color{red}{2}}^n f(m)$$ (The proof of this result is similar to the analytic proof we have done.)

Note:

  1. $\log 1=0$, so that we can replace $\sum\limits_{m = \color{red}{2}}^n \log m$ by $\sum\limits_{m = \color{red}{1}}^n \log m$
  2. If $f(1)>0$ clearly $\int\limits_1^n f(x) \ \mathrm{dx} \leq \sum\limits_{m = \color{red}{2}}^n f(m) \le \sum\limits_{m = \color{red}{1}}^n f(m)$
  3. You might be interested in the reading about integral test.
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$
  1. $$\int_1^n \log(x) dx=[x\log(x)-x]_1^n=n\log(n)-n+1\lt \sum_{m=1}^n \log(m)=\log(\prod_{m=1}^n m)=\log(n!)\approx n\log(n)-n + O(\log(n)),$$ where I used Stirling's approximation. The next term in the $O(\log(n))$ is $(1/2)\log(2\pi n)>1$, for $n>1$.
  2. No, assume $f(x)=-\log(x)$...
$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .