0
$\begingroup$

i am doing proof of wedderburn artin theorem from T Y Lam but the fact used in proof is decomposing semisimple Ring R as FINITE direct sum of minimal left ideals, but in in definition it is said to be direct sum of a family of minimal ideals, and explaination is as 1 belongs to R so sum will be FINITE. I don't get it, i know direct sum means only finitely many non zero elements but why 1 belong to R forces only finite number of minimum ideals in decomposition of semisimple ring R. i know answer to it is very short but its just not clicking. any help or hint? thanks

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

See theorem 3.4 on p. 16 here. In short, a partition of unity picks out a sufficient finite set of minimal left ideal summands to span the ring.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.