3
$\begingroup$

It looks to me like I finished the proof, but I want to make sure; the part near the end seems like it could be better.

The problem states: Prove that the polynomial $f(x) = x^5 + x^3 − 1$ has exactly one real root.

Polynomials are continuous and differentiable everywhere, so the Intermediate Value Theorem and Rolle's Theorem apply. Slightly arbitrarily, $f(0)=-1$ and $f(1)=1$. By the IVT, $f(a)=0$ for some $a\epsilon[0,1]$. Thus there is at least one real root.

Now, I think I'm supposed to reach a contradiction using Rolle's Theorem, so I assume $f$ has two real roots, i.e., $f(x_1)=0$ and $f(x_2)=0$. By the theorem, there is $a\epsilon(x_1,x_2)$ such that $f'(a)=0$.

$f'(x)=5x^4+3x^2$, and $f'(x)=0$ iff $x=0$. Thus $a=0$ and $0\epsilon(x_1,x_2)$. Thus $x_1<0$ and $x_2>0$.

But $x_1$ is supposed to be a root of $f(x)$; there cannot possibly be a negative root of the given polynomial. Thus the assumption that there are two is false.

Is this sufficient? At first I thought so, but I've only shown there can't be two. Couldn't there be three roots?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ works fine if you replace 'has two roots' with 'has at least two different roots, say $x_1$ and $x_2$' $\endgroup$ – mm-aops Jun 6 '14 at 19:08
3
$\begingroup$

$f^{\prime}$ is always positive so $f$ is increasing everywhere. Thus at most one root, and since it goes to plus and minus infinity there must be at least one root.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ positive a.e. actually, still works tho $\endgroup$ – mm-aops Jun 6 '14 at 19:09
  • $\begingroup$ It has an inflection at $0$. $\endgroup$ – Rene Schipperus Jun 6 '14 at 19:11
3
$\begingroup$

We have $0 \leq f'(x)$ for all real $x$, so $f$ is monotonic, so has only one root.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Of course, your version seems easier. Oddly, the hint for the problem recommends using Rolle's theorem for the second part, but I don't think this method requires this, does it? $\endgroup$ – RubberDucky Jun 6 '14 at 19:11
  • $\begingroup$ you need it to be strictly monotonic, so the answer isn't complete, need to say that $f'=0$ at a single point doesn't spoil things. also: the fact that $f' \geq 0$ implies $f$ non-decreasing is usually deduced from Rolles / Lagrange theorem, so in a way it still uses it $\endgroup$ – mm-aops Jun 6 '14 at 19:16
2
$\begingroup$

You are helped by the fact that the roots of the derivative are easily computable, so that you can decompose the domain into intervals between the extrema.

An interval contains a root iff the extrema have opposite signs.

[For complete rigor, you need to discard multiple roots by taking the gcd of $f$ and $f'$.]

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.