2
$\begingroup$

Looking to show that $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\beta)$ where $\alpha = \sqrt{1+\sqrt{3}}, \beta = \sqrt{1 - \sqrt{3}}$ is Galois via showing that $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\beta)$ is the splitting field for a separable polynomial (or some easier method of showing that the field is Galois). So the minimial polynomial in $\mathbb{Q}$ for $\alpha$ is $x^{4}-2x^{2}-2$ and the minimal polynomial in $\mathbb{Q}$ for $\beta$ is the same i.e. $x^{4}-2x^{2}-2 \in \mathbb{Q}$, hence we need to extend by $i$ to $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\beta)$ to include all roots. I know that $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\beta): \mathbb{Q}]=8$ which is the degree of the field extension and the corresponding Galois group, but am wondering:

(1) how to construct a separable polynomial which is (i) of degree 8 and (ii) splits linearly (thus is separable) over $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\beta)$;

(2) whether the elements of the Galois group $G(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\beta))$ are just those automorphisms that (in addition to the identity automorphism) send $\alpha$ to $-\alpha, \pm\beta$ and $\beta$ to $-\beta, \pm\alpha$ or whether (as this doesn't give me 8), I need to include $\alpha\beta$ and $\alpha \pm \beta$ here too.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand what you mean by "we need to extend by $i$ to $\Bbb Q(\alpha,\beta)$ to include all roots." What does that mean exactly? $\endgroup$ – blue May 27 '14 at 3:13
2
$\begingroup$

$\beta$ is not real, so $\beta \notin \Bbb Q(\alpha)$. As you noticed, $\beta$ and $\alpha$ share the same minimal polynomial, whose roots are $\alpha,-\alpha,\beta,-\beta$.
Therefore, $(X-\beta)(X+\beta) = (X^4 -2X^2-2)/(X-\alpha)(X+\alpha) \in \Bbb Q(\alpha)[X]$ is the minimal polynomial of $\beta$ over $\Bbb Q(\alpha)$, so $\Bbb Q(\alpha,\beta)$ has degree $8$ and is the splitting field of the polynomial $X^4-2X^2-2$.

Now about the Galois group. Since the extension is Galois it has order $8$. One automorphism is determined by the image of $\alpha$ (among the $4$ candidates), which determines the image of $- \alpha$, and then the image of $\beta$ among the two remaining roots.

We can write them down explicitly and find its group structure : Let $\phi$ be defined by $\phi(\alpha,\beta) = (\beta,- \alpha)$.
Then $\phi^2(\alpha,\beta) = \phi(\beta, -\alpha) = (-\alpha,-\beta)$
$\phi^3(\alpha,\beta) = \phi(-\alpha,-\beta) = (-\beta,\alpha)$
$\phi^4(\alpha,\beta) = \phi(-\beta,\alpha) = (\alpha,\beta)$, so $\phi$ has order $4$.
Let $\psi$ be defined by $\psi(\alpha,\beta) = (-\alpha,\beta)$. $\psi$ has order two, and the remaining automorphisms are
$\psi\phi(\alpha,\beta) = \psi(\beta,-\alpha) = (\beta,\alpha)$
$\psi\phi^2(\alpha,\beta) = (\alpha,-\beta)$
$\psi\phi^3(\alpha,\beta) = (-\beta,-\alpha)$

$\phi\psi(\alpha,\beta) = \phi(-\alpha,\beta) = (-\beta,-\alpha) = \psi\phi^3(\alpha,\beta)$ so $\phi\psi = \psi\phi^3$ : the group is not commutative.

All of this shows that the group is isomorphic to the diedral group of order $8$, $D_8$.

$D_8$ has three subgroups of order $4$ and $5$ subgroups of order $2$, corresponding to $\Bbb Q(\sqrt {-2}), \Bbb Q(\sqrt 3),\Bbb Q(\sqrt {-6}),\Bbb Q(\sqrt {-2},\sqrt 3) ,\Bbb Q(\alpha), \Bbb Q(\beta), \Bbb Q(\alpha+ \beta), \Bbb Q(\alpha-\beta)$.
See if you can find a simplified expression of $\alpha+\beta$ and $\alpha-\beta$

In order to get an irreducible polynomial of order $8$ that splits completely, you need the minimal polynomial of an element of $\Bbb Q(\alpha,\beta)$ that is not fixed by any element of the Galois group. For example you can pick the minimal polynomial of $\alpha+2\beta$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks mercio. I've worked out the $\textbf{D}_{8}$ correspondence and am now working out the corresponding Galois sub-fields for each subgroup. Should I just choose $\gamma=\alpha\beta$ as the normal basis generator (that seaturtle mentions above) to which the automorphisms in the subgroups should be applied? The way we learnt in class is a bit cumbersome as it involves applying the automorphisms to the general form of polynomials in $L$, then comparing with the general form of such polynomials to see which factors remain. $\endgroup$ – PistolsAtDawn May 27 '14 at 11:14
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I was having some trouble inserting the polynomial into the comments part so I posted in the main section...and I just noticed I didn't even insert it in the end! $\endgroup$ – PistolsAtDawn May 27 '14 at 11:22
  • $\begingroup$ You don't necessarily need a normal basis, you only need to find for every subgroup $H$ some element $x \in L$ whose invariant subgroup is $H$. First it's better to pick an element at random (like $\alpha\beta$ or $\alpha$), then compute its invariant subgroup then poof you have a pair subfield <-> subgroup. To get a normal basis you need an element $\gamma$ that is changed by every nontrivial automorphism. This is not the case with $\alpha\beta$. Moreover, this is not sufficient. Picking $\alpha+2\beta$ will not give you a free family, for example. $\endgroup$ – mercio May 27 '14 at 11:41
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks for the feedback $\endgroup$ – PistolsAtDawn May 27 '14 at 12:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.