The question is rather simple. All my definitions are as in Do Carmo's "Riemannian Geometry".

If $M$ is a Riemannian Manifold, can I construct an affine connection $\nabla$ on it by setting, for all $i,j=1,...,n$ $$ \nabla _{\partial x_i} \partial x_j=\sum \Gamma^k_{ij}\partial x_k $$ where $\Gamma^k_{ij}$, $i,j,k=1,...,n=dim(M)$ are arbitrary $C^\infty$ functions over $M$? If not, is there any way I can stablish conditions for the symbols for this construction to work?

I see no problem in doing so. The Christoffel symbols does not seem to depend on the metric, neither am I requiring the connection to be symmetric or compatible with the metric.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The Christoffel symbols, of course, depend on the coordinate system, and any definition of them must be consistent under changes of coordinates. $\endgroup$ May 24, 2014 at 0:21
  • $\begingroup$ @user49048 isn't that already satisfied by the fact that they are smooth functions over the manifold (therefore, consistent under coordinate change?. $\endgroup$
    – Marra
    May 24, 2014 at 0:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Marra: No not necessarily but I guess a partition of unity should work then... $\endgroup$ May 24, 2014 at 1:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Marra See this question, which gives a formula for how Christoffel symbols transform under changes of coordinates. If you haven't derived that formula before, it's a good exercise. (Don't pay attention to the answer to the question in the link, since the answer assumes that the connection is the Levi-Civita connection associated to some metric.) $\endgroup$ May 24, 2014 at 1:22

1 Answer 1


A connection $\nabla_X Y$ is required to be $C^\infty(M)$-linear in $X$, $\mathbb R$-linear in $Y$, and satisfy the Leibnitz rule. So if you have a coordinate system on all of $M$, or more generally, a framing $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ of the tangent bundle by some vector fields (ie linearly independent at each point of $M$), you can pick any $n^3$ functions $\Gamma^k_{ij}$ you wish, and, as you suggest, define $\nabla_{X_i}X_j=\sum_k \Gamma^k_{ij}X_k$, and extend by the above rules for arbitrary $X,Y$. If you cannot find such framing (eg for the 2 sphere), and you insist on defining a connection in this way, then you are reduced to covering $M$ by open sets on each of which you can follow yr suggestion, but then need to check that the resulting connection is consistently defined on the intersections of the open sets of your cover. So you need formulas that tells you how the $\Gamma$'s transform when the framing is changed. These you can derive easily from the above axioms for a connection.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .