6
$\begingroup$

The ring of matrix is not an integral domain. How to prove that the inverse is unique?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You don't need it to be an integral domain to have unique inverses. $\endgroup$ – mez May 22 '14 at 18:34
17
$\begingroup$

If $ab=ba=1$, and if also $ac=ca=1$, you have $c=(ba)c=b(ac)=b$. In fact, if you reread it, this shows that whenever you know both a left inverse exists and a right inverse exists, then actually they are the same element, so it is a two-sided inverse and it is unique.

It has little to do with integral domains: it's true for any associative operation with an identity.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could also mention that your argument actually shows that if a left inverse and a right inverse exist, then they are equal and so he inverse exists and is unique. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami May 22 '14 at 18:52
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinArgerami Good idea: I added that. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – rschwieb May 22 '14 at 19:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.