Are there uncountably infinite orders of infinity? Given a set $S$, one can easily find a set with greater cardinality -- just take the power set of $S$. In this way, one can construct a sequence of sets, each with greater cardinality than the last. Hence there are at least countably infinite many orders of infinity.
But do there exist uncountably infinite orders of infinity?
To be precise, does there exist an uncountable set of sets whose elements all have distinct cardinalities?
The first answer to Types of infinity suggests the answer is "yes", but only establishes a countable number of cardinalities (which, to be fair, was what the question was asking about).
I've been exposed to enough mathematical logic to realize that I'm walking in a minefield; let me know if I've already mis-stepped.
 A: The answer is yes.  See "Fact 20" at the end of the following handout:
http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete/settheorypart1.pdf
Edit: Fact 20 states

For no set $I$ does there exists a family of sets $\{S_i\}_{i∈I}$ such that every set $S$ is equivalent to $S_i$ for at least one $i$.

Proof: Take $S_\text{bigger} := 2^{\cup_{i\in I}S_i}$. There is no surjection from $\cup_{i\in I}S_i$ onto
$S_\text{bigger}$, so for sure there is no surjection from any $S_i$ onto $S_\text{bigger}$.$\quad\square$
A: Pete's excellent notes have correctly explained that there is no set containing sets of unboundedly large size in the infinite cardinalities, because from any proposed such family, we can produce a set of strictly larger size than any in that family. 
This observation by itself, however, doesn't actually prove that there are uncountably many infinities. For example, Pete's argument can be carried out in the classical Zermelo set theory (known as Z, or ZC, if you add the axiom of choice), but to prove that there are uncountably many infinities requires the axiom of Replacement. In particular, it is actually consistent with ZC that there are only countably many infinities, although this is not consistent with ZFC, and this fact was the historical reason for the switch from ZC to ZFC. 
The way it happened was this. Zermelo had produced sets of size $\aleph_0$, $\aleph_1,\ldots,\aleph_n,\ldots$ for each natural number $n$, and wanted to say that therefore he had produced a set of size $\aleph_\omega=\text{sup}_n\aleph_n$. Fraenkel objected that none of the Zermelo axioms actually ensured that $\{\aleph_n\mid n\in\omega\}$ forms a set, and indeed, it is now known that in the least Zermelo universe, this class does not form a set, and there are in fact only countably many infinite cardinalities in that universe; they cannot be collected together there into a single set and thereby avoid contradicting Pete's observation. One can see something like this by considering the universe $V_{\omega+\omega}$, a rank initial segment of the von Neumann hierarchy, which satisfies all the Zermelo axioms but not ZFC, and in which no set has size $\beth_\omega$. 
By adding the Replacement axiom, however, the Zermelo axioms are extended to the ZFC axioms, from which one can prove that $\{\aleph_n\mid n\in\omega\}$ does indeed form a set as we want, and everything works out great. In particular, in ZFC using the Replacement axiom in the form of transfinite recursion, there are huge uncountable sets of different infinite cardinalities. 
The infinities $\aleph_\alpha$, for example, are defined by transfinite recursion:


*

*$\aleph_0$ is the first infinite cardinality, or $\omega$.

*$\aleph_{\alpha+1}$ is the next (well-ordered) cardinal after $\aleph_\alpha$. (This exists by Hartog's theorem.)

*$\aleph_\lambda$, for limit ordinals $\lambda$, is the supremum of the $\aleph_\beta$ for $\beta\lt\lambda$. 


Now, for any ordinal $\beta$, the set $\{\aleph_\alpha\mid\alpha\lt\beta\}$ exists by the axiom of Replacement, and this is a set containing $\beta$ many infinite cardinals. In particular, for any cardinal $\beta$, including uncountable cardinals, there are at least $\beta$ many infinite cardinals, and indeed, strictly more.
The cardinal $\aleph_{\omega_1}$ is the smallest cardinal having uncountably many infinite cardinals below it.
