To clarify I acknowledge that both gambling systems will produce a loss long term. The question is, if my calculations are correct regarding them, and if one system is more disastrous than the other.
First game is Keno. I select 6 numbers (to win) out of 80 and 20 numbers are drawn. I assume that each number has a 0,25 chance (for simplicity) and the payouts are as following:
*6 numbers won = 1600
*5 numbers won = 50
*4 numbers won = 7
*3 numbers won = 1
I will come back to keno in a bit. Moving forward to sports betting where I select 6 events on 4.00 odds assuming no bookmaker edge (for simplicity) and 0,25 chance for each event to win. I gamble the 6 events in the combinations of 6fold,5fold,4fold and 3fold resulting in a total of 42 bets. Assuming 1 euro per bet the total is 42 euros.
Now back to Keno assuming a x42 multiplier the winnings change to:
*6 numbers won = 1600*42=67200
*5 numbers won = 50*42=2100
*4 numbers won = 7*42=294
*3 numbers won = 1*42=42
While the results of sports betting would be:
*6 events won = 15360
*5 events won = 2944
*4 events won = 512
*3 events won = 64
The question is which of the two gambling methods is less disastrous than the other and why?
To answer my own question Keno will have a payout of 0,48 and sports betting a payout of 0,22 but I am not sure if I calculated it correct
EDIT: How sports betting payouts are calculated:
*Assuming you win a three fold the payouts are 4*4*4 = 64
*Assuming you win a four fold the payouts are 1 four fold + 4 three folds = 4*4*4*4 + 4*64= 256+256=512
*Assuming you win a five fold the payouts are 1 five fold + 5 four folds + 10 three folds = 4*4*4*4*4 + 5*(4*4*4*4) + 10*64 = 1024 + 1280 + 640 = 2944