Many proofs of the structure theorems for finite abelian groups first reduce to the problem to $p$-groups, which is fine and is an important technique.

However, it seems to me that a simple proof can be based on this one crucial result:

Every finite abelian group has a cyclic direct factor. $\qquad(\star)$

From this, it follows at once by induction on the order of the group that

Every finite abelian group is a direct product of cyclic groups.

The Chinese remainder theorem then allows us to split these cyclic groups into cyclic $p$-groups and so we get the primary decomposition theorem:

Every finite abelian group is a direct product of cyclic $p$-groups.

The Chinese remainder theorem then allows us to reassemble these into an invariant factor decomposition.

Note that the proof is really easy once we have the crucial result $\star$ (and the Chinese remainder theorem of course).

I think Mac Lane and Birkoff in their Algebra do something along this line but it is not very simple.

Does anyone know a proof of the structure theorems along the lines above?

In particular, is there a simple proof of the crucial result $\star$ ?

(A side bonus would be a simple characterization of the cyclic subgroups that are direct factors of a given finite abelian group: I expect they are exactly the maximal cyclic subgroups.)

  • $\begingroup$ Re: your last comment: there can be lots of cyclic direct factors, more than will fit in a single representation. For example, the group $Z_{12}\times Z_2$ can also be written as $Z_6\times Z_4$ and $Z_4\times Z_3\times Z_2$; so it has at least $5$ cyclic direct factors. $\endgroup$ – Greg Martin May 13 '14 at 1:59
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see a copy online (and... it's in German) but you may wish to seek out: Die Theorie der Gruppen vonendlicher Ordnung (possibly volume 2). $\endgroup$ – Benjamin Dickman May 13 '14 at 2:09
  • $\begingroup$ @BenjaminDickman : and the author is...?! $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio May 13 '14 at 3:45
  • $\begingroup$ @DonAntonio Speiser, as can be found through google: scholar.google.com/… $\endgroup$ – Benjamin Dickman May 13 '14 at 4:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I would use Prüfer/Kulikoff's idea: a finite subgroup of an abelian group is a direct factor if and only if it is a pure subgroup. This is done in Kaplansky's short textbook on Infinite Abelian Groups - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_subgroup $\endgroup$ – Jack Schmidt May 21 '14 at 13:59

Rotman's Introduction to the Theory of Groups (theorem 6.9 on page 130) contains such a proof, attributed to Schenkman, but this proof is not exactly as I have outlined in the question.

enter image description here

The book The Theory of Finite Groups: An Introduction, by Kurzweil and Stellmacher, does what I had in mind in Chapter 2.

  • $\begingroup$ But what is "the lemma"? In particular, does it apply when $d=1$ (and thus $g=0$)? $\endgroup$ – mr_e_man Feb 13 '20 at 1:55
  • $\begingroup$ Well, suppose we know that any vector $a\in\mathbb Z^n$ with GCD$(a)=1$ can be completed into a unimodular matrix $A$. Call its inverse $B$. Then we can define $$g_j=\sum_iA_{ij}x_i$$ (so $g=g_1$, after renaming $-a_1/d$ as $a_1$ etc.); it follows that $$\sum_iB_{ij}g_i=\sum_iB_{ij}\sum_kA_{ki}x_k$$ $$=\sum_k\sum_iA_{ki}B_{ij}x_k=\sum_k\delta_{kj}x_k=x_j.$$ This shows that anything generated by $\{x_1,\cdots,x_n\}$ is also generated by $\{g_1,\cdots,g_n\}$. $\endgroup$ – mr_e_man Feb 13 '20 at 3:09

For finite abelian $p$-groups you can do the following to split off a maximal cyclic subgroup as a direct summand.

If $q=p^n$ is the order of a maximal cyclic subgroup $H$ of our group $G$, then $G$ is a module over the ring $R=Z/qZ$. Now $H$ is free as an $R$-module, and $R$ is a self injective ring, so that $H$ is in fact injective. The inclusion $H\to G$ is therefore split.

  • $\begingroup$ Since the direct product of self-injective rings is self injective, this extends to the general case. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez May 23 '14 at 1:51
  • $\begingroup$ If $H$ is a maximal cyclic subgroup of $G$ of order $n$, you can say that $G$ is a module over $\Bbb Z/n\Bbb Z$? $\endgroup$ – Fabio Lucchini Jun 2 '18 at 22:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.