3
$\begingroup$

Im trying to solve the following problem.

Let $\Omega \in \mathbb{C}$ an open bounded set, let $f\colon \Omega \to \mathbb{C}$ be holomorphic, and supose there exists a constant $M \geq 0$ wich satisfies that if $(z_n)_{n\geq 1}$ is a convergent sequence of points in $\Omega$ such that if $\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} z_n \in \partial\Omega$ then $\limsup\limits_{n \to \infty} |f(z_n)| \leq M $.

Prove that for all $z \in \Omega$ we have $|f(z)| \leq M$.

My attempt: First supose $f$ is not constant because if it is constant i have nothing to prove, because the lim sup is equal to $f(z)$ in any point and it would be true. Then, as we said, supose $f$ is not constant, and supose the condition doesnt satisfies, that is there exists some $z$ such that $|f(z)| > M$, then the all the $z$ that do this cannot be a discrete set, because I can pick the maximum of the set and would get that the function is constant by the Maximum Modulus Principle. So the set $A =$ {$z$ such that $|f(z)| > M$} is infinite, now if $\overline A = \Omega$ i would reach a contradiction, because I can pick a sequence $(z_n) \subset A$, convergent to the border which would yield that $M < limsup |f(z_n)| \leq M$. The thing is if A is not dense in $\Omega$ then Im a bit lost.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

You don't need that $A$ is dense, all you need is that there is at least one sequence converging to (a point of) $\partial\Omega$ with $\limsup \lvert f(z_n)\rvert > M$.

On the path you started on, you can modify $A$, choose an $\varepsilon > 0$ such that $\lvert f(z)\rvert > M+\varepsilon$ for some $z\in\Omega$, and use $\tilde{A} = \{z \in \Omega : \lvert f(z)\rvert > M + \varepsilon\}$. When only demanding $\lvert f(z)\rvert > M$, you cannot deduce that $\limsup \lvert f(z_n)\rvert > M$ when $z_n$ is a sequence in $A$ converging to a point of $\partial \Omega$, therefore we only consider points where the value of $\lvert f(z)\rvert$ is larger than something fixed that is larger than $M$.

Then the problem is to deduce that there is at least one sequence in $\tilde{A}$ converging to a point of $\partial \Omega$. Now, if there weren't such a sequence, then $\tilde{A}$ would have a positive distance from $\partial \Omega$, that means there is a $\delta > 0$ such that

$$\tilde{A}\subset \Omega_\delta = \{ z \in \Omega : D_\delta(z) \subset \Omega\}.$$

But then $f$ would be holomorphic on $\Omega_\delta$ and continuous on $\overline{\Omega}_\delta$, and

$$\sup_{z\in\partial \Omega_\delta} \lvert f(z)\rvert \leqslant M+\varepsilon < \sup_{z\in\tilde{A}} \lvert f(z)\rvert$$

contradicts the maximum modulus principle.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

Take the closure of the curve union lim sup. Take max of closure.
By Max mod principle , the max is on the boundary.
Only lim sup could be on the boundary. QED

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.