6
$\begingroup$

prove or disprove following matrix is positive definite matrix ?

$$\begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\sin(a_1-a_1)}{a_1-a_1}&\cdots&\dfrac{\sin(a_1-a_n)}{a_1-a_n}\\ \vdots& &\vdots\\ \dfrac{\sin(a_n-a_1)}{a_n-a_1}&\cdots&\dfrac{\sin(a_n-a_n)}{a_n-a_n} \end{bmatrix}_{n\times n}$$ and where we defind $$\dfrac{\sin 0}{0}=1$$

Maybe this problem can use Integral to solve it. since $$\frac{1}{x} = \int_0^\infty e^{-tx} t \, dt$$? Thank you

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Let $b_{kl}=\frac{\sin{(a_k-a_l)}}{a_k-a_l}$. The symmetric $n\times n$ matrix $M=(b_{kl})$ is positive definite, if and only if $(a_1,\ldots,a_n)$ are distinct.

Note that $$\frac{\sin a}{a}=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^1e^{iat}dt$$ Thus, for ${\bf x}=(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\in\Bbb{C}^n$ we have $$\eqalign{ {\bf x}^*M{\bf x}&=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^1\sum_{k,l=1}^nx_k\overline{x_l}e^{i(a_k-a_l)t}dt\cr &=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^1\left\vert\sum_{k=1}^n{x_k}e^{ia_k t}\right\vert^2 dt\geq0\tag{1} } $$ Thus $M$ is positive. Moreover, Suppose that ${\bf x}^*M{\bf x}=0$ we want to prove that $$x_1=x_2=\cdots=x_n=0.$$ From $(1)$ we conclude that the continuous function $t\mapsto \sum_{k=1}^n{x_k}e^{ia_k t}$ is zero on $[-1,1]$. Now, consider the function $f$ defined by $f(z)=\sum_{k=1}^n{x_k}e^{ia_k z}$, this is an analytic function in $\Bbb{C}$ that is equal to $0$ for $z\in[-1,1]$, so it must be identically zero.

Consider $j\in\{1,\ldots,n\}$, we have $$ \forall\,t\in \Bbb{R},\quad \sum_{k=1}^nx_ke^{i(a_k-a_j)t}=0 $$ hence, for $T>0$, $$ \sum_{k=1}^nx_k\left(\frac{1}{2T}\int_{-T}^Te^{i(a_k-a_j)t}dt\right)=0 $$ Letting $T$ tend to $\infty$ we conclude that $x_j=0$. Here we use that fact that $$ \lim_{T\to\infty}\frac{1}{2T}\int_{-T}^Te^{i wt}dt=\left\{\matrix{1&w=0\cr 0&w\ne 0}\right. $$ and the announced conclusion follows.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Are there any other assumptions you forgot to add? A counter-example which comes to mind is to take $n = 2$ and $a_1 = a_2 = 1$ so that the matrix is just $$ \left( \begin{matrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{matrix} \right), $$ which is positive semidefinite, but not positive definite since one of its eigenvalues is $0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: the best approach is use the characterization of positive definiteness that all principal minors should have positive determinant. $\endgroup$ – P Vanchinathan May 6 '14 at 3:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.