I am relatively new still to linear optimization and as I understand it, the two phase method is a common practice for finding the bfs before using the simplex or a simplex like solver (a solver relying on an initial bfs). I am using this document as a resource to understand how to construct a phase I, but I am getting doubts that the author has provided all the information needed.
I'll skip to the standard form of the problem which is as follows
\begin{align*} \text{max } & 2x_1 &+ 3x_2 &+ x_3 & \\ \end{align*}
Subject to
\begin{align*} &x_1 & +x_2 & +x_3 & +x_4 & & & =40\\ 2&x_1 & + x_2 & -x_3 & & -x_5 & & =10\\ & & -x_2 & +x_3 & & &-x_6 & =10\\ \end{align*}
Where
\begin{align*} x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5,x_6\geq0 \end{align*}
We can see that we have 3 constraints and yet we only add two artificial variables $x_7$ and $x_8$. I believe that 2 artificial variables are always sufficient because it is explained that if $x_7+x_8=0$ then both independently equal 0.
The author doesn't state that two is sufficient but I believe it is what he is implying. Is this the correct interpretation?