3
$\begingroup$

How to prove that $$\operatorname{End}_R(V^{ \oplus n }) \cong M_n(D),$$ where $V$ is a simple left $R$-module and $D=\operatorname{End}_R(V)$.

This is part of the proof finally leads to prove that ring is simple and left semi-simple if and only if it is isomorphic to $M_n(D)$ for some division ring $D$, and what's already been proved is that $End_R(V \oplus W) \cong End_R(V) \oplus End_R(W)$ and its corollary.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes,it is just a title $\endgroup$ – starry1990 May 4 '14 at 2:08
  • $\begingroup$ How would you do this if $R$ was a field and $V$ just a vector space? The idea is really very similar. Of course, I'm assuming that $V$ is simple here. $\endgroup$ – Siddharth Venkatesh May 4 '14 at 7:14
3
$\begingroup$

Let $R=F$ be a field, and consider $V$ and $W$ with $F$ dimension each $1$. Then $\mathrm{End}_F(V)=\mathrm{End}_F(W)=F$, so their direct sum is $F\oplus F$. $W\oplus V$ is two dimensional, hence $\mathrm{End}_F(V\oplus W)$ is four dimensional. Thus you can see that $\mathrm{End}_R(V \oplus W)$ is not isomorphic to $\mathrm{End}_R(V) \oplus \mathrm{End}_R(W)$ in general.

The real picture is this, although it would need some explanation:

$\mathrm{End}_R(V\oplus W)\cong \begin{bmatrix}\mathrm{End}_R(V)&\mathrm{Hom}_R(W,V)\\\mathrm{Hom}_R(V,W)&\mathrm{End}_R(W)\end{bmatrix}$

You can picture these as working as matrix multiplication on the left side of pairs $\begin{bmatrix}v\\w\end{bmatrix}\in V\oplus W$. Of course when $V=W$, you just get

$\mathrm{End}_R(V\oplus V)\cong \begin{bmatrix}\mathrm{End}_R(V)&\mathrm{End}_R(V)\\\mathrm{End}_R(V)&\mathrm{End}_R(V)\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}D&D\\D&D\end{bmatrix}$

So one way to fix the approach you've outlined is to prove the real version of the lemma you mentioned: $\mathrm{End}_R(\oplus_{i=1}^n V_i)\cong \oplus_{i=1}^n[\oplus_{j=1}^n\mathrm{Hom}_R(V_i,V_j)]$

Following the $2\times 2$ example above, you should be able to see the way.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Question: isn't the last isomorphism you mention one of abelian groups instead of algebras? $\endgroup$ – Bib Jul 20 '15 at 5:26
  • $\begingroup$ @bib nope: it is an algebra isomorphism (and a group isomorphism). The right hand side is not a direct sum of rings, yet it has a natural ring structure. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Jul 20 '15 at 9:49
  • $\begingroup$ what is the multiplication? $\endgroup$ – Bib Jul 20 '15 at 20:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Bib formal matrix multiplication where the entries of the matrix come from the hom groups. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Jul 21 '15 at 0:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.