# Prove that if $A$ is normal, then eigenvectors corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are necessarily orthogonal (alternative proof)

The problem statement is as follows:

Prove that for a normal matrix $A$, eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are necessarily orthogonal.

I can certainly prove that this is the case, using the spectral theorem. The gist of my proof is presented below.

If possible, I would like to find a simpler proof. I was hoping that there might be some sort of manipulation along these lines, noting that $$\langle Av_1,A v_2\rangle = \langle v_1,A^*Av_2\rangle = \langle v_1,AA^*v_2\rangle = \langle A^* v_1,A^* v_2 \rangle$$

Any ideas here would be appreciated.

## My proof:

Let $\{v_{\lambda,i}\}$ be an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors (as guaranteed by the spectral theorem) such that $$A v_{\lambda,i} = \lambda v_{\lambda,i}$$ Let $v_1,\lambda_1$ and $v_2,\lambda_2$ be eigenpairs with $\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2$. We may write $v_1 = \sum_{i,\lambda}a_{i,\lambda}v_{i,\lambda} .$ We then have $$0 = Av_1 - \lambda_1 v_1 = \sum_{i,\lambda}(\lambda - \lambda_1)a_{i,\lambda}v_{i,\lambda}$$ So that $a_{i,\lambda} = 0$ when $\lambda \neq \lambda_1$. Similarly, we may write $v_2 = \sum_{i,\lambda}b_{i,\lambda}v_{i,\lambda}$, and note that $b_{i,\lambda} = 0$ when $\lambda \neq \lambda_2$. From there, we have $$\langle v_1,v_2 \rangle = \sum_{i,\lambda}a_{i,\lambda}b_{i,\lambda}$$ the above must be zero since for each pair $i,\lambda$, either $a_{i,\lambda}=0$ or $b_{i,\lambda} = 0$.

• "Let $v_{\lambda,i}$ be an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors..." I'd guess that this might be something very close to what would need to be proved. – Algebraic Pavel May 3 '14 at 2:13
• @PavelJiranek I was worried that I had used circular logic at some point. However, the existence of such a basis (i.e. the spectral theorem) comes directly from the Schur triangularization theorem, which says nothing about normal matrices in particular. – Ben Grossmann May 3 '14 at 19:11

Assume $\;\lambda\neq \mu\;$ and

$$\begin{cases}Av=\lambda v\;\,\implies\; A^*v=\overline \lambda v\\{}\\Aw=\mu w\implies A^*w=\overline\mu w\end{cases}$$

From this we get:

$$\begin{cases}\langle v,Aw\rangle=\langle v,\mu w\rangle=\overline\mu\langle v,w\rangle\\{}\\ \langle v,Aw\rangle=\langle A^*v,w\rangle=\langle\overline\lambda v,w\rangle=\overline\lambda\langle v,w\rangle \end{cases}$$

and since $\;\overline\mu\neq\overline\lambda\;$ , we get $\;\langle v,w\rangle =0\;$

Question: Where did we use normality in the above?

• How de we know that $v$ is also an eigenvector for $A^*$? – Berci May 2 '14 at 22:55
• @Berci, read and think of the question at the end of the answer. – DonAntonio May 2 '14 at 22:56
• From the other two answers this follows, of course, using that $A$ is normal. But can you show it directly? – Berci May 2 '14 at 22:57
• Why directly? Use the definition and work it out. I usually don't give full answers and, after all, the OP is trying to get a more or less simpler proof to the claim than the one using the spectral theorem... – DonAntonio May 2 '14 at 23:00
• Can someone give me a clue as to where you used normality in the above? – ikoikoia Jul 9 '18 at 1:19

Specializing your identity to $v_1=v_2=v$, we get $\|Av\|=\|A^*v\|$. Hence $\ker A=\ker A^*$. Recalling that $\ker A^* = (\operatorname{ran} A)^\perp$ for general $A$, we conclude that the kernel and range of a normal matrix are mutually orthogonal.

It remains to apply the above conclusion to $A-\lambda I$ where $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$.

• Neat! Although DonAntonio's proof is more along the lines I was thinking of, this is a nice perspective. – Ben Grossmann May 2 '14 at 23:16

I try to give another simple proof to $$T^*v=\bar{\lambda}v ~\text{ if }~ Tv=\lambda v$$ where $T$ is a normal operator on a Hilbert space $H$.

Suppose $V=\ker(T-\lambda I)$. Since $T^*$ communicate with $T$, $$T^*V\subset V.$$ Because $$\langle v,T^*v\rangle =\langle Tv,v\rangle =\langle \lambda v,v\rangle=\langle v,\bar{\lambda}v\rangle ~~\forall v \in V,$$ $\langle u,T^*v\rangle =\langle u, \bar{\lambda}v\rangle ~\forall u,v\in V$ by polarisation identity, and thus $T^*v=\bar{\lambda}v.$

REMARK: Let $\sigma:V\times V\to W$ be a sesquilinear form, where $V$ and $W$ are linear vector spaces over $\mathbb{C}$. The follwing formula is called Polarisation Identity : $$\sigma(u,v)=\sum_{k=0}^3 i^k\sigma(u+i^k v, u+i^kv).$$

• I don't really see how this answer addresses the question being asked. Also, the question being asked was answered 3 years ago. – Ben Grossmann Jun 12 '17 at 15:01
• @Omnomnomnom This is why $Av=\lambda v\Rightarrow A^*v=\bar{\lambda}v$ using no spectral theorem which is the point to the question I think. – C.Ding Jun 13 '17 at 2:37
• That is not the point to the question, actually. The point is to show that eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are necessarily orthogonal. – Ben Grossmann Jun 13 '17 at 2:58
• Oh, sorry to disturb you. As I give some additional remarks to the right answer you have accepted. – C.Ding Jun 13 '17 at 3:04

A normal matrix is unitarily similar to diagonal matrix.

$$A = UDU^{-1}$$ where $U$ is Unitary matrix.

Eigen decompositions tells that $U$ is a matrix composed of columns which are eigenvectors of $A$. And matrix $D$ is Diagonal matrix with eigenvalues on diagonal.

Property: Columns of Unitary matrix are orthogonal.

So, columns of $U$ (which are eigenvectors of $A$) are orthogonal.