0
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

(1.) Not querying proofs or formality. I do this in my other question.

Normal Subgroup Test says H is normal in G $\iff gH{g}^{-1}\subseteq H$ for all $g \in G$.
What's the intuition of this subset 'equation'?

(2.) Intuitively, how's a subset equation equivalent to 1,2,3 overhead?

p. 6 http://www.millersville.edu/~bikenaga/abstract-algebra-1/normal/normal.html:
If you know a subgroup is normal, $gHg^{-1} = H$ is the "stronger" form. On the other hand, if you're trying to prove that a subgroup H is normal in a group G, all you need to show is that $gHg^{-1} \subseteq H$ for all $g \in G$ (as opposed to equality).

(3.) How is equality a "stronger" form than the subset form, when these two are proven as equivalent? Stronger $\neq$ equivalent?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Instead of "querying", try "asking"; replace "overhead" with "above". $\endgroup$ – Namaste Apr 28 '14 at 14:14
1
$\begingroup$

I hope that this answers (partially) your question:

For a specific $g\in G$ the statement $gHg^{-1}=H$ is a stronger statement than $gHg^{-1}\subset H$. The first implies the second but the opposite is not necessarily true.

However the statements $\forall g\in G\; gHg^{-1}\subset H$ and $\forall g\in G\; gHg^{-1}=H$ are equivalent.

This because from the first we can deduce that also $H=g\left(g^{-1}Hg\right)g^{-1}\subset gHg^{-1}$ for each $g\in G$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.