0
$\begingroup$

The question is :

Let $L/K$ be a field extension. Then $L/K$ is algebraic extension IFF every sub-ring of $L$ , containing $K$, is a field.

My solution: Firstly, I must say I am unable to show both way implication. I have shown only ONE way & hope that it is correct.

CLaim:- Let $L/K$ be a field extension. Then if $L/K$ is algebraic extension & $\exists$ a sub-ring $S$ such that: $K \subseteq S \subseteq L$ ; THEN $S$ is a field .

Justification:- Let $s \neq 0 \in S$ . Since: $s \in L$ & $L/K$ is algebraic; so we have some minimal polynomial: $x^{n}+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+....+a_{0}$ with coefficients in $K$ -which is satisfied by $s$ . By minimality, the coefficient $a_{0}$ must be non-zero; i.e. it has an inverse $a_{0}^{-1}$ in $K$. Then $s(-a_{0}^{-1})(s^{n-1}+a_{n-1}s^{n-2}+....+a_{1}) = 1$ .So, $s^{-1} = (-a_{0}^{-1})(s^{n-1}+a_{n-1}s^{n-2}+....+a_{1})$ .Now, since: each of $a_{i}$ & $s$ $\in S$, thus $s^{-1} \in S$. Consequently, $S$ is a field.

My query:

1) Please check the solution & rectify if necessary.I think it's okay!So, just have a look.

2) What about the converse part?? Please give a detailed solution for that part!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The converse is the easy statement. What if the extension is not algebraic? Isn’t there then a nonalgebraic element? What sort of ring does it generate? $\endgroup$ – Lubin Apr 27 '14 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ method of contradiction???...wait wait... let me think... !! Actually I was trying to prove it directly!! Is my part of the solution ok??..Btw, what do you mean by "what sort of ring" ?? @ Lubin $\endgroup$ – user86511 Apr 27 '14 at 19:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your half looked fine to me on a quick scan. $\endgroup$ – Lubin Apr 27 '14 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ okkay... so, if the extension is NOT algebraic, then $\exists$ an element, say $l \in L$ which is NOT algebraic over $K$ . Now, what "sort" of ring it generates??.. this I have to find..right?? $\endgroup$ – user86511 Apr 27 '14 at 19:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So if the element $\alpha$ is nonalgebraic, each polynomial expression $\sum_jc_j\alpha^j$ with coeffs in your smallest field $K$ is different! So you have an isomorphism between $K[X]$ and the smallest ring containing $K$ and $\alpha$. $\endgroup$ – Lubin Apr 27 '14 at 21:47
2
$\begingroup$

Assume every ring between $K$ and $L$ is a field. Then every element $a\in L$ is algebraic: Let $a\in L$. There exists a unique ring homomorphism $\phi\colon K[X]\to L$ that is the identity on $K$ and sends $X\mapsto a$. The image of $\phi$ is an intermediate ring, hence is a field. As $K[X]$ is not a field ($X$ is not invertible), $\phi$ has nontrivial kernel. If $0\ne f\in\ker \phi$ then $f(a)=0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.