I'm having a hard time grasping the concept of finding the number of Sylow p-subgroups. Consider a group $G$ of order $3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 = 105$. Now, let's find the number of Sylow 3-subgroups for this group: we have

$5 \equiv 2 \pmod 3\\7 \equiv 1 \pmod 3\\35 \equiv 2 \pmod 3$

So $1$ and $7$ are my options, by Sylow's third theorem. How do I determine which, in a none-bruteforce manner? (That is, I consider "we found $2$ so there must be $7$" a bad method. If you disagree strongly about this, feel free to present your argument and convince me, as long as you present a convenient method for the case where it is $1$).


You do need to bruteforce insofar as the answer depends on details of the group. We could have $G\cong (Z_7\rtimes Z_3)\times Z_5$ where there are seven and we could have $G\cong Z_{105}$ where there is just one.

  • $\begingroup$ Just to be clear: given that we only know the order of the group, there is no way to determine whether its $1$ or $7$ in our scenario? $\endgroup$ – Andrew Thompson Apr 25 '14 at 17:31
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, Exactly. I didnÄt check though if the number of $5$-groups or the number of $7$-groups is fully determined. Or if there are still more groups ... $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Apr 25 '14 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ Well, they may only be fully determined if there is only one if we only know the order of the group, if I understand you correctly. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Thompson Apr 25 '14 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ For a group of order $105$, the number of $5$-Sylows is exactly $1$, same for $7$-Sylows. $\endgroup$ – Mikko Korhonen Apr 25 '14 at 17:47
  • $\begingroup$ @MikkoKorhonen, why isn't $21$ an alternative for $5$-Sylow? $7 \cdot 3 \equiv 1 \pmod 5$. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Thompson Apr 25 '14 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.