Call your sum $f_n.$ Following Wilf we introduce the generating
function
$$F(z) = \sum_{n\ge 0} f_n z^n
= \sum_{n\ge 0} z^n \sum_{k=0}^n k^d {n\choose 2k}
= \sum_{n\ge 0} z^n \sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor} k^d {n\choose 2k}.$$
We will extract the closed form as the coefficient $[z^n] F(z).$
Now the trick is to interchange summations, getting
$$F(z) = \sum_{k\ge 0} k^d \sum_{n\ge 2k} {n\choose 2k} z^n
= \sum_{k\ge 0} k^d \sum_{n\ge 0} {n+2k\choose 2k} z^{n+2k}
\\= \sum_{k\ge 0} k^d z^{2k} \sum_{n\ge 0} {n+2k\choose 2k} z^n
= \sum_{k\ge 0} k^d z^{2k} \frac{1}{(1-z)^{2k+1}}
\\ = \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k\ge 0} k^d
\left(\frac{z^2}{(1-z)^2}\right)^k.$$
Now observe that
$$\sum_{q\ge 0} q^d z^q
= \frac{1}{(1-z)^{d+1}}
\sum_{p=0}^{d-1} \left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle z^{p+1}$$
where we have introduced Eulerian numbers.
This implies that
$$F(z) = \frac{1}{1-z}
\frac{1}{(1-z^2/(1-z)^2)^{d+1}}
\sum_{p=0}^{d-1}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
\left(\frac{z^2}{(1-z)^2}\right)^{p+1}.$$
This is
$$\frac{1}{1-z}
\frac{(1-z)^{2d+2}}{(1-2z)^{d+1}}
\sum_{p=0}^{d-1}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
\left(\frac{z^2}{(1-z)^2}\right)^{p+1}
\\ =
\frac{1}{1-z}
\frac{(1-z)^{2d+2}}{(1-2z)^{d+1}}
\sum_{p=0}^{d-1}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
z^{2p+2} (1-z)^{-2p-2}
\\=
\frac{1}{(1-2z)^{d+1}}
\sum_{p=0}^{d-1}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
z^{2p+2} (1-z)^{2d-2p-1}.$$
Extracting coefficients from this (we need $[z^n] F(z)$) we obtain
$$\sum_{q=0}^n {n-q+d\choose d} 2^{n-q}
\sum_{p=0}^{d-1}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
[z^q] z^{2p+2} (1-z)^{2d-2p-1}.$$
Considering the degree of the polynomial in the inner sum we see that
for a non-zero contribution we must have
$$q\ge 2p+2 \quad\text{and}\quad q\le 2d+1.$$
Therefore we restrict ourselves to $n\ge 2d+1$ and $p\le (q-2)/2$
to obtain
$$\sum_{q=2}^{2d+1} {n-q+d\choose d} 2^{n-q}
\sum_{p=0}^{\lfloor (q-2)/2\rfloor}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
[z^q] z^{2p+2} (1-z)^{2d-2p-1}
\\ = \sum_{q=2}^{2d+1} {n-q+d\choose d} 2^{n-q}
\sum_{p=0}^{\lfloor (q-2)/2\rfloor}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
[z^{q-2p-2}] (1-z)^{2d-2p-1}
\\ = 2^n \sum_{q=2}^{2d+1} {n-q+d\choose d} 2^{-q}
\sum_{p=0}^{\lfloor (q-2)/2\rfloor}
\left\langle d\atop p\right\rangle
(-1)^{q-2p-2} {2d-2p-1\choose q-2p-2}.$$
Now the key observation at this point is that the number of terms in
the sum no longer depends on $n$ but only on $d.$
This means we can obtain a closed form by evaluating the $2d$ terms
in the sum.
We get for $d=2$ the formula
$${2}^{n} \left( 1/4\,{n\choose 2}-3/8\,{n-1\choose 2}
+1/4\,{n-2\choose 2}-1/16\,{n-3\choose 2} \right)$$
which simplifies to
$$\frac{1}{32} \,{2}^{n}\;n \left( n+1 \right).$$
For $d=3$ we get
$${2}^{n} \left( 1/4\,{n+1\choose 3}-5/8\,{n\choose 3}
+{\frac {7}{8}}\,{n-1\choose 3}\\-{\frac {11}{16}}\,{n-2\choose 3}+{\frac
{9}{32}}\,{n-3\choose 3}-{\frac {3}{64}}\,{n-4\choose 3} \right)$$
which is
$${\frac {1}{128}}\,{2}^{n}{n}^{2} \left( n+3 \right),$$
and so on.
The last example I will present here is $d=7$ which gives
$${2}^{n} \left( 1/4\,{n+5\choose 7}-{\frac {13}{8}}\,{n+4\choose 7}
+{\frac {99}{8}}\,{n+3\choose 7}-{\frac {803}{16}}\,{n+2
\choose 7}\\+{\frac {4253}{32}}\,{n+1\choose 7}
-{\frac {15903}{64}}\,{n\choose 7}+{\frac {5413}{16}}\,{n-1\choose 7}-{\frac {
5441}{16}}\,{n-2\choose 7}\\+{\frac {8085}{32}}\,{n-3\choose 7}
-{\frac {4389}{32}}\,{n-4\choose 7}+{\frac {13545}{256}}\,{n-5
\choose 7}-{\frac {7035}{512}}\,{n-6\choose 7}
\\+{\frac {2205}{1024}}\,{n-7\choose 7}-{\frac {315}{2048}}\,{n-8\choose 7}
\right)$$
which is
$${\frac {1}{32768}}\,{2}^{n}{n}^{2} \left( {n}^{5}+21\,{n}^{4}
+105\,{n}^{3}+35\,{n}^{2}-210\,n+112 \right).$$
The apparent pattern in the OP that the closed form is a multiple of
$${n+d-1\choose d}$$ does not hold.
Concluding remark. Seeing the effort above it seems almost certain
that a much more elegant solution using Zeilberger / Sister Celine can
be found. In my experiments it has appeared however that the latter
method produces recurrences that have a number of terms that is not linear in $d$. The reader
may want to compare resource allocation of telescoping vs. the closed
formula above.