Say we have a finite CW complex with cells only in even degrees. For example a $\mathbb {CP}^n$ or a complex flag variety. If we know the rational cohomology ring, does it also determine the integral cohomology ring?


3 Answers 3


Form two CW-complexes $X_f$ and $X_g$ by choosing attaching maps $f, g: S^3 \to S^2$ with Hopf invariant $H(f) = 1$ and $H(g) = 2$. Then, $H^*(X_f, \mathbb Q)$ and $H^*(X_g, \mathbb Q)$ are isomorphic as graded rings, but $H^*(X_f, \mathbb Z) = \mathbb Z[x_2]/(x_2^3)$ is not isomorphic to $H^*(X_g, \mathbb Z) = \mathbb Z[x_2, y_4]/(x_2^2 - 2y_4, y_4^2, x_2y_4)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Do these complexes only have cells in even dimensions? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, they both have 1 cell each in dimensions 0, 2 and 4. (Using the appropriate CW structure on $S^2$). $\endgroup$
    – user17892
    Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 19:04
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see, I misunderstood how your construction worked. I now understand you're simply describing an attaching map of a 4-cell onto $S^2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 19:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The OP asked for a finite CW complex, but then gave examples which are closed manifolds. Do you happen to know the answer if we restrict to closed manifolds? I'd be surprised if the rational cohomology ring determines the integral ring in this case, but I don't know of any counter examples off hand. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 19:21
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the fast answer! $\endgroup$
    – Jan
    Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 19:39

Following Najib's suggestion, I'll promote my comment to an answer.

Here is an infinite family of examples of closed simply connected manifold with cells only in even dimensions with isomorphic rational cohomology rings but pairwise non-isomorphic integral cohomology rings.

First, consider $\mathbb{C}P^3$ as the set of complex lines in $\mathbb{C}^4$. We identify $\mathbb{C}^4$ with $\mathbb{H}^2$, where $\mathbb{H}$ denotes the quaternions. Each complex line in $\mathbb{C}^4$ can be enlarged to a quaternionic line in $\mathbb{H}^2$ buy multiplying by $j$ and taking the span of the two complex lines.

This determines a map $\mathbb{C}P^3 \stackrel{\pi}{\rightarrow} \mathbb{H}P^1 = S^4$. In fact, this map is a fiber bundle map with fiber $S^2$, so we have a bundle $S^2\rightarrow \mathbb{C}P^3\rightarrow S^4$.

Now, fix an integer $k\neq 0$. Let $g:S^4\rightarrow S^4$ be any map of degree $k$. Let $S^2\rightarrow E_k \stackrel{\pi_k}{\rightarrow} S^4$ denote the bundle obtained by pulling back $S^2\rightarrow \mathbb{C}P^3\rightarrow S^4$ along $g$.

Claim 1: $E_k$ has a cell structure with only even degree cells.

Proof: $S^2\times S^4$ certainly does as $S^2$ and $S^4$ individually have a decomposition into even degree cells. But the decomposition into cells for a non-trivial bundle is the same as for the trivial bundle, but with different gluing maps.


Claim 2: The generator of $H^2(E_k)\cong\mathbb{Z}$ squares to $k$ times a generator in $H^4(E_k)\cong\mathbb{Z}$.

Believing this for a moment, its clear that the rational cohomology rings will be isomorphic (unless $k = 0$).

Proof: Let $x\in H^2(\mathbb{C}P^3)$ generate the cohomology ring. From the pull back diagram we have a commutative diagram of fiber bundles $\begin{array} SS^2 & \stackrel{id}{\longrightarrow} & S^2 \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ E_k & \stackrel{\overline{g}}{\longrightarrow} & \mathbb{C}P^3 \\ \downarrow{\pi_k} & & \downarrow{\pi} \\ S^4 & \stackrel{g}{\longrightarrow} & S^4 \end{array}$

From the Gysin sequence for each bundle, we see the map $H^2(E_k)\rightarrow H^2(S^2)$ is an isomorphism, as is the map $H^2(\mathbb{C}P^3)\rightarrow H^2(S^2)$. By commutativity of the top square, we deduce that $\overline{g}^\ast(x)$ generates $H^2(E_k)$.

Now, let $y\in H^4(S^4)$ be generator. From the Serre spectral sequence, we see that $\pi^\ast(y)$ generates $H^4(\mathbb{C}P^3)$, so $\pi^\ast(y) = x^2$ and also that $\pi_k^\ast(y)$ generates $H^4(E_k)$.

Now, recalling that $\overline{g}^\ast(x)$ generates $H^2(E_k)$, we compute \begin{align*} \overline{g}^\ast(x)^2 &= \overline{g}^\ast(x^2)\\ &= \overline{g}^\ast(\pi^\ast(y))\\ &= \pi_k^\ast(g^\ast(y))\\ &= \pi_k^\ast(ky)\\ &= k\pi_k^\ast(y). \end{align*}

In other words, the generator of $H^2(E_k)$ squares to $k$ times a generator of $H^4(E_k)$.



If the attaching maps have different non zero degrees the cohomology rings are isomorphic over Q iffi the ratio is a square in Q. The units in Q mod squares is a countable sum of Z/2Z ‘s.

So curiously , the Q question is more interesting than this writer perceived in the discussion above .

Dennis Sullivan

  • $\begingroup$ I took the question to be about what you can learn about the cohomology over $\mathbb Z$ from the $\mathbb Q$ cohomology ring. I certainly don't presume to know more than Dennis Sullivan about rational homotopy theory, though! $\endgroup$
    – user17892
    Commented Nov 11, 2021 at 19:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .