It is a known result that if $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer in a number field $K$, i.e. $\alpha \in \mathcal{O}_K$, then its trace and norm are integers.
I am looking over a proof of this, which proceeds as follows:
- Assume $\alpha \in \mathcal{O}_K$, and let its $K$-conjugates be $\alpha_1,...,\alpha_n$
- Let $L$ be the splitting field of the minimum polynomial of $\alpha$, say $m_\alpha$
- Then clearly the trace and norm of $\alpha$ are in $\mathcal{O}_L$
- The trace and norm of $\alpha$ are in $\mathbb{Q}$
- $\mathbb{Q} \cap \mathcal{O}_L=\mathbb{Z}$
- The trace and norm of $\alpha$ are in $\mathbb{Z}$
My problem is with claim 5. Consider the following:
Define $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt2)$, $\alpha=\sqrt3$. Then, $L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt2,\sqrt3)$. Now, $\frac{1}{2} \in \mathbb{Q}$ and $\frac{1}{2} \in \mathcal{O}_L$ (consider the monic $2x-1$), but $\frac{1}{2} \notin \mathbb{Z}$, so 5 doesn't hold.
Can anyone point out where I'm going wrong here...
EDIT
It has been pointed out to me (and is very obvious) that since $2x-1$ is not in fact monic, my question is a little senseless. Instead then, can anyone answer the following:
Why is $\mathbb{Q} \cap \mathcal{O}_L=\mathbb{Z}$?