Let $\langle , \rangle$ be a non-degenerate bilinear form with the signature $(p,q)$ on a real vectorspace $V$ and $W_1, W_2$ subspaces, such that the restriction $\langle , \rangle |_{W_i}$ is non-degenerate with signature $(p,0)$.

Show that for the orthogonal direct sum decomposition $V = W_2 \oplus W_2^\perp$ and the induced projection $V \to W_2$ the composition $$W_1 \hookrightarrow V \twoheadrightarrow W_2$$ is an isomorphism.

  • $\begingroup$ From the data you have, what do you know about the dimensions of $W_1,W_2$ and $V$? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Apr 18 '14 at 8:50
  • $\begingroup$ Well, to be an isomorphism the dimensions of $W_1$ and $W_2$ have to be equal, and since $V$ is the direct sum of $W_2 \oplus W_2$ it should have the same dimension as $W_1$ and $W_2$. To be honest I'm confused of the data, I don't see how it all connects... $\endgroup$ – sj134 Apr 18 '14 at 16:53
  • $\begingroup$ Point 1: What does the signature of the bilinear form signify? Point 2: What does it mean that the form is nondegenerate (on $V$, resp. on $W_i$)? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Apr 18 '14 at 17:03
  • $\begingroup$ The signature gives the rank and dimension of the bilinear form with $p+q$ and being non-degenerate means that the determinant of the gramian matrix is non zero and that the map $V \to V^*,v \mapsto \langle v,\cdot \rangle$ is injective. $\endgroup$ – sj134 Apr 19 '14 at 8:10
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for the delay. That's right, but only in part what I was aiming for (but, how were you to know what I was aiming for). Anyway, since the form is non-degenerate on both $W_i$ and has the same signature on both, it follows that $\dim W_1 = \dim W_2$. Now, for $W_1 \hookrightarrow V \twoheadrightarrow W_2$ to be an isomorphism, what still is needed is that $W_1 \cap W_2^\perp = \{0\}$. That follows from the signatures. But to see that, you need to know what the signature means, what the parts stand for. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Apr 20 '14 at 23:09

The signature $(p,q)$ of the bilinear form gives the maximal dimensions of the subspaces on which $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$ is positive respectively negative definite.

Hence the premise that the restriction of the bilinear form to both $W_i$ is nondegenerate with signature $(p,0)$ means

  • $\dim W_1 = \dim W_2 = p$,
  • $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle\lvert_{W_i}$ is positive definite, and
  • $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$ is not positive definite on any subspace properly containing one of the $W_i$.

Now, with the injection $\iota \colon W_1 \hookrightarrow V$ and the projection $\pi \colon V \twoheadrightarrow W_2$ with kernel $W_2^\perp$, since the dimensions of $W_1$ and $W_2$ are the same, the composition $\pi \circ \iota$ is an isomorphism if and only if it is injective. We have

$$\ker (\pi\circ \iota) = \iota^{-1}(\ker \pi) = W_1\cap \ker\pi = W_1 \cap W_2^\perp,$$

so we must prove that $W_1\cap W_2^\perp = \{0\}$.

Consider the subspace $U = W_2 \oplus (W_1 \cap W_2^\perp)$ of $V$. Deduce that $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle\lvert_U$ is positive definite, and hence $\pi\circ\iota$ is an isomorphism.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.