11
$\begingroup$

Does there exist a ring which is not a principal ideal ring and which has exactly six different ideals?

(For me a ring is commutative with a unit element.)

I can show that any ring having at most five ideals is a principal ideal ring.

EDIT: The proof goes as follows, it is not so hard. Suppose that $R$ is a ring which is not principal and which has at most five ideals. Then there must exist a proper ideal of the form $(\alpha,\beta)$ in $R$ which is not principal. Then $(0), (\alpha),(\beta),(\alpha, \beta), R$ must be the five different ideals of $R$. But what about $(\alpha + \beta)$? It cannot be $(0)$ or $(\alpha,\beta)$ or $R$. Say that it is $(\alpha)$. Then we get that $\alpha \mid \beta$, hence $(\alpha,\beta) = (\alpha)$, contradiction! Similarly, it cannot be $(\beta)$. Hence we are done.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you sketch the proof about the 5-ideals ring ? I am interested in this result. $\endgroup$ – user10676 Oct 25 '11 at 12:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ From the statement "$R$ has an ideal which isn't principal" it does not follow that there is a nonprincipal ideal of the form $(\alpha,\beta)$. Maybe 2-generated ideals are all principal, and that the best you can do is $3$ or more. But still, you can pick a minimal finite generating set for the nonprincipal ideal and argue similarly. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Dec 15 '15 at 15:56
12
$\begingroup$

Yes; the ring $R=\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(x,y)^2$ has exactly six ideals, namely $$R$$ $$|$$ $$(x,y)$$ $$\text{ / }\qquad |\qquad \text{ \ }$$ $$\quad\quad(x)\quad\quad(y)\,\,\,\,\quad (x+y)$$ $$\text{ \ } \qquad |\qquad \text{ / }$$ $$(0)$$ There are only 8 elements of the ring (representatives are of the form $a+bx+cy$, for $a,b,c\in\mathbb{F}_2$) and one can check that these are all the ideals by first examining all the principal ideals, which end up being the ideals $(0),(x),(y),(x+y),R=(1)$; then noting that any non-principal proper ideal must contain exactly 4 elements (as an additive subgroup of $R$, it must have size 1, 2, or 4; but if it is of size 1 or 2 it will necessarily be principal, generated by either 0 (if size 1) or its non-zero element (if size 2)), and any of the 4 elements $1+bx+cy$ is a unit, so it can't contain any of them if it is to be proper. Hence the only non-principal ideal is $(x,y)$.

By the way, this ring came up in my question here.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Nice, thanks. I can also show that any ring having at most five ideals has to be a principal ideal ring. So this is a "minimal" example! $\endgroup$ – Evariste Oct 25 '11 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Zev -- I used this ring in this answer :-) $\endgroup$ – joriki Jul 14 '12 at 22:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.