As remarked in the "talk" part of the wikipedia article, the proof is done with elements of a set and functions. I guess it's possible to carry it out purely with "objects" and "arrows"

Who volonteers to do that?

Edit: If possible without that Freyd embedding thm mentionned in the talk.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Why don't you take a crack at it? $\endgroup$ – Ian Coley Apr 10 '14 at 19:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The obvious part is that a biproduct implies that the short exact sequence splits on the right and on the left. For the converse, the fact that the short exact sequence splits on either side with give a diagram that looks pretty much like either a product or a coproduct, here is where I am $\endgroup$ – Noix07 Apr 10 '14 at 19:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is proposition 1.8.7 in Borceux's Handbook of Categorical Algebra, Vol II - Categories and Structures. $\endgroup$ – user153312 Jan 7 '15 at 19:53

Notations: The short exact sequence splits on the left

$$ 0 \longrightarrow A \underset{\underset{\phi}{\longleftarrow}}{\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}} B \overset{g}{\longrightarrow} C \longrightarrow 0 \quad, \quad \phi\circ f =\mathrm{id}_A$$

Let's show that $B \cong A\oplus C$

$\underline{1)}\ $$\enspace \phi\circ f = \mathrm{id}_A\ \Rightarrow\ P:= f\circ \phi $ is an idempotent ($P\circ P=P$).

  • Any arrow in an abelian category has an image so that $P$ splits into $ B \overset{j_P}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{Im}(P) \overset{i_P}{\longrightarrow} B $ with $j_P$ epi and $i_P$ mono (cf. the equivalent def. of image and the property that $j_P$ is epi in categories with finite limits and colimits)

  • $j_P$ is actually a left inverse of $i_P$: $$i_P\, j_P\,i_P\, j_P= P^2 = P = i_P\, j_P\quad\underset{i_p\ \text{mono}}{\overset{j_P\ \text{epi}}{\Longrightarrow}}\quad j_P\,i_P= \mathrm{id}_{\mathrm{Im}(P)}$$

  • $j_P\circ f$ is actually an isomorphism $A \cong \mathrm{Im}(P)\ $: $f\circ \phi$ is a factorization of $P$ so that by the universal property of the image (in the sense of "initial factorization") there exists a unique morphism $v: \mathrm{Im}(P)\to A$ such that $i_P =f\, v$ and $\phi =v\, j_P$ whence

    $$(j_P\, f)\, v = j_P\, i_P = \mathrm{id}_{\mathrm{Im}(P)}\quad ,\quad v\,(j_P\, f)= \phi \, f = \mathrm{id}_A$$

(This is Proposition 10.2 p.12 from "Theory of Categories", Barry Mitchell: In a balanced category, if a morphism has an image and an (Epi-Mono) factorization then the mono is the image)

$\underline{2)} $ Hom sets of an abelian category are abelian groups so that it makes sense to define $$Q := \mathrm{id}_B -P\quad \in\big(\mathrm{Hom}(B,B),+\big)$$

As previously, $Q$ factorizes as $Q=i_Q \circ j_Q$ and with $i_P, i_Q$ mono, $j_P, j_Q$ epi $$ QP = QP = 0\quad \Longrightarrow\quad j_P\circ i_Q = 0 \enspace ,\enspace j_Q \circ i_P = 0 \qquad (Eq)$$

$\underline{3)} $ The two maps $\ i_P: \mathrm{Im}(P)\rightarrow B\ ,\ i_Q: \mathrm{Im}(Q)\rightarrow B $ define by the universal property of the coproduct a map $\Phi: \mathrm{Im}(P)\coprod \mathrm{Im}(Q) \rightarrow B$ (this could also be written $i_P+i_Q$, + symbolically if we were not in an abelian category )

and the two maps $j_P : B \rightarrow \mathrm{Im}(P)\ ,\ j_Q : B \rightarrow \mathrm{Im}(Q) $ a map $\Psi: B\rightarrow \mathrm{Im}(P)\prod \mathrm{Im}(Q)$

Using $j_P\circ i_{P} = \mathrm{id}_{\mathrm{Im}(P)},\ j_Q\circ i_Q = \mathrm{id}_{\mathrm{Im}(Q)},\ (Eq)$ and the definition of biproduct, one checks the isomorphism $B\cong \mathrm{Im}(P)\oplus \mathrm{Im}(Q)$, i.e. $$ \Phi\circ \Psi =P+Q = \mathrm{id}_B\quad \text{and} \quad \Psi\circ \Phi =\mathrm{id}_{\mathrm{Im}(P)\oplus\mathrm{Im}(Q)}$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why does it suffice to prove: $B\cong A\oplus C$ $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Jan 15 '17 at 0:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, I wrote everything very roughly... I would now say that we want something slightly more, an isomorphism of two short exact sequences: $A\oplus C$ is both the product and coproduct of $A, C$ s.t. the canonical injections and projections satisfy $\pi_A\, \iota_A=\mathrm{id}_A,\ \pi_C\, \iota_C=\mathrm{id}_C,\ \pi_C\, \iota_A=\pi_A\, \iota_C$. This is expressed as a short exact sequence $0\to A\to A\oplus C\to C \to 0$ that splits. One also writes the original s.e.s. $0\to A\to B\to C \to 0$. A morphism of exact sequence is a triple $(A\to A, B\to A\oplus C, C\to C)$ s.t. the squares... $\endgroup$ – Noix07 Feb 14 '17 at 0:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ [...] commute. So instead of just having $B\cong A\oplus C$, an isomorphism of short exact sequences consists in three isomorphisms. Of course, one would usually chose $(A\to A, C\to C)$ to be the identity of the respective object but then $B\to A\oplus C$ needs to satisfy some conditions. Now, if our original s.e.s. is isomorphic to the second one which splits, then it also splits. (Sorry for the late answer, I guess you may have figured it out since ages...) $\endgroup$ – Noix07 Feb 14 '17 at 0:10
  • $\begingroup$ No worries, I will think about it after my exams! Thanks! :) $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Feb 14 '17 at 1:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.