I'm reading some notes about coordinate rings. On the third example on the second page, the author notes that the coordinate ring $K[\mathcal{C}]$ is not a UFD.

If $f=X^2+Y^2-1$, then in $K[\mathcal{C}]$, we have $$ Y^2+(f)=(1-X)(1+X)+(f) $$ but the elements $Y+(f)$, $1+X+(f)$ and $1-X+(f)$ are irreducible.

Is there a reason that it is clear that these three elements are irreducible?

Writing $Y+(f)=g(X,Y)h(X,Y)+(f)$ and trying to verify one of $g+(f)$ or $h+(f)$ is a unit is getting a little hairy.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I suspect $Y+(f)$ is not irreducible as $Y=0$ intersects our unit circle in two points! $\endgroup$ – Ehsan M. Kermani Apr 10 '14 at 2:35
  • $\begingroup$ @EhsanM.Kermani Indeed $Y$ is not irreducible. $\endgroup$ – Alex Becker Apr 10 '14 at 2:36
  • $\begingroup$ Already solved here. $\endgroup$ – user26857 Apr 11 '14 at 17:01

At least $Y$ is not irreducible if there is some $i\in K$ such that $i^2=-1$. We have $$K[\mathcal C]\cong K[\cos \theta,\sin \theta]\cong K[e^{ix},e^{-ix}]\cong K[t,t^{-1}]$$ via the maps $$X\mapsto \cos\theta\mapsto \frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}\mapsto \frac{t+t^{-1}}{2}$$ $$Y\mapsto \sin\theta\mapsto \frac{-ie^{ix}+ie^{-ix}}{2}\mapsto \frac{-it+it^{-1}}{2}$$

Note that $Y\mapsto \frac12(-it+it^{-1})$ is irreducible iff $2i\cdot \frac12(-it+it^{-1})=t-t^{-1}$ is. But $t-t^{-1}=(1+t^{-1})(t-1)$, and neither of these are units since the units of $K[t,t^{-1}]$ are of the form $at^n$ with $a$ nonzero and $n\in\mathbb Z$. In $K[\mathcal C]$ this factorization looks like:


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Huh, so the notes are incorrect? That's a little troubling. Well, thanks for your answer! $\endgroup$ – Nastassja Apr 10 '14 at 2:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Nastassja I'm not sure whether it's always not a UFD, so that claim might be right, but $Y$ is not always irreducible. $\endgroup$ – Alex Becker Apr 10 '14 at 3:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Nastassja In fact, looking at the notes they assume $K$ is algebraically closed, so $Y$ is never irreducible. $\endgroup$ – Alex Becker Apr 10 '14 at 3:04

Remark that (under the assumption the characteristic of $K$ is not $2$), $\mathcal C$ is a smooth curve, and therefore $K[\mathcal C]$ is a Dedekind domain. Indeed, $\mathcal C$ is isomorphic, by stereographic projection ($X=\frac{1-T^2}{1+T^2}, Y=\frac{2T}{1+T^2}$), to $\mathbf P^1-\{\pm i\}$, which is an open subscheme of $\mathbf P^1$ and therefore smooth.

On a smooth curve, a section of the structure sheaf is determined, up to multiplication by a unit, by its divisor. It follows immediately that $1-X$ and $1+X$ are irreducible, since their divisors consist of a single point.

On the other hand I claim that $Y$ is irreducible if and only if $i \notin K$. The divisor of $Y$ is $[A]+[B]$, where $A=(1,0)$, $B=(-1,0)$. The only way to write this divisor as a sum of two positive nontrivial divisors is as $[A]+[B]$.

Thus, in order to see whether $Y$ is irreducible, we should look for a $W\in K[\mathcal C]$ with divisor precisely $[A]$ (i.e. a function which vanishes simply at $A$ and nowhere else on $\mathcal C$). Viewing $W$ as a rational function on $\mathbf P^1 = \overline{\mathcal C}$, it follows from the residue theorem that if $a_i, a_{-i}$ denote the orders of $W$ at $i$ and $-i$ then it should be the case that $$a_i+ a_{-i}+1=0.$$ If $i\in K$, there is no obstruction to finding a $W$ which does the job, since every degree $0$ divisor on $\mathbf P^1$ is principal. By writing down the details one recovers Alex's factorization of $Y$.

On the other hand, if $i\notin K$ then $W$ is a rational function of the form $g(T)/(1+T^2)^n$, so $a_i=a_{-i}$ and therefore $a_i+ a_{-i}$ is even. It is then impossible to have $a_i+ a_{-i}+1=0$.

In fact, a little more work shows that $K[\mathcal C]$ is a PID if and only if $i \in K$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.