0
$\begingroup$

Can someone please give an explanation for the following questions I have just been stuck on this part forever:

1) How do we sketch a function of two variables i.e $f(x,y)=x^2+y^2$ and how do we sketch a function of three variables i.e $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$. Is the same method used for both, if not what is the difference and what is the method used? Also I understand a function of two variables is a surface in $\mathbb{R}^3$ but for a function of three variables should that not be done in $\mathbb{R}^4$ which I understand is not possible to visualize so how exactly do we sketch a function of three variables in $\mathbb{R}^3$?

Also I'm not being able to differentiate between functions of two variables and functions of three variables e.g if we have $z=f(x,y)=x^2+y^2$ surely we can take the rhs to the lhs and get $z-x^2+y^2=0$ so is this not a function of three variables.

I also can't tell the difference between a function and an equation.E.g $z=x^2-y^2$ is a function but $z=x^2$ is an equation, how can we tell this? Are functions and equations sketched differently?

What is the difference between a level curve, a level surface and a level set?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

First, the term level set is the generic term. level curve and level surface are special cases. When you have a function of 2 variables: $z=f(x,y)$, setting the output equal to a constant, say $c$, yields an equation: $c=f(x,y)$. All points $(x,y)$ which satisfy this equation form a graph (in the $xy$-plane). This collection of points is called a level curve.

Now if you have a function of 3 variables: $w=f(x,y,z)$, setting the output equal to a constant, say $c$, yields an equation: $c=f(x,y,z)$. All points $(x,y,z)$ which satisfy this equation form a graph (in 3-space). This collection of points is called a level surface.

Generically, level curves are in fact curves and level surfaces are in fact surfaces (there are weird cases where a level curve is empty or 1 point or the whole plane, but usually you get a curve - the same weirdness can happen for level surfaces).

Next, how do you graph $z=x^2+y^2$? To do this by hand, first identify what its level curves look like: $c=x^2+y^2$ (these are circles centered at the origin). Often it is helpful to find a few other "traces" as well (level curves come from intersecting with $z=c$. In general, a "trace" is an intersection with any plane). For example: $x=0$ yields $z=y^2$ (a parabola) and $y=0$ yields $z=x^2$. So horizontal cross sections are circles and vertical cross sections are parabolas. This is a circular paraboloid whose graph looks like this.

Finally, for $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$, you are correct that a graph of $w=x^2+y^2+z^2$ would live in $\mathbb{R}^4$ (so we can't visualize it). If someone asks you to graph such a thing, they probably meant to say "graph a few of its the level surfaces". If this is what is meant, then the level surfaces have equations of the form $c=x^2+y^2+z^2$. These are spheres of radius $\sqrt{c}$ centered at the origin (assuming, of course, that $c>0$). When $c=0$, we just get the origin and if $c<0$, the level surface is empty.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for your explanation. Another question, apart from the level surface, can we also sketch traces for the graph of f(x,y,z)? $\endgroup$ – user134785 Apr 7 '14 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ Sure. But you'll need to cut through with a "hyper-plane" instead of a plane -- that is -- something whose general formula is $ax+by+cz+dw=0$ for some constants $a,b,c,d$ (not all zero). So for example you could take the trace through $x=0$. This would yield the equation: $w=0^2+y^2+z^2=y^2+z^2$ which is a paraboloid. :) $\endgroup$ – Bill Cook Apr 7 '14 at 16:12
  • $\begingroup$ I know this is a dumb question but I still want to ask just to be sure, if I'm asked to sketch e.g z=x^2+y^2 and x^2+y^2-z=0, the first one which is a function as well as an equation and the second one which is just an equation, I will get the same graph right? $\endgroup$ – user134785 Apr 7 '14 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. The two equations are equivalent so they yield the same graph. $\endgroup$ – Bill Cook Apr 8 '14 at 1:31
0
$\begingroup$

To sketch a function of 3 variables, we could take several level surfaces and animate them (with time being the 4th dimension). Here are example of animations of 4-d objects. One is a 4-cube, and the other is a morphing of a torus.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/8-cell.gif. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/26/Mug_and_Torus_morph.gif

Alternatively, we may also want to consider color as a 4th dimension http://abeolson.com/images/2011/exampleSurfPlot.png

Obviously, by using both time and color we could sketch a function in 5 dimensions.

The reason that you can't tell the difference between a function and an equation is because you're defining functions the same way that high school math teachers define them. An equations is sometimes part of a function definition, but a function needs more than just an equation. Here's is an example of a function definition $$f:R^2\to{R} | for\:all (x,y)\epsilon R^2\:there\:exists\:f(x,y)\epsilon R|f(x,y) = x^2+y^2$$ The point here is that a function definition needs a universal, as well as an existential quantifier, in addition to an equation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.