1
$\begingroup$

I am stuck deriving the familiar d'Alembert formula using the Method of Descent, going from 2D to 1D. After using Kirchhoff's Formula, writing the solution independently of $y$ and some manipulations, I have obtained the following result. $$\frac{1}{2\pi c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} \frac {g(x)} {({(ct)^2} - x^2)^{(1/2)}}dx $$

Where the initial conditions are $f(x) \equiv 0$ and $u_t = g(x)$.

How do I further reduce the integral to the familiar equation: $${u(x,t) = \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct}g(\overline{x}) d\overline{x}} $$

It is very close to the desired result, but the next step escapes me at this moment. Should I consider Polar coordinates or a change of variables?

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I am unsure if this answers your question, but maybe it might still help. The proof of the wave equation i know uses the descend method only for higher dimensions. The derivation of the 2d wave equation i know (following evans) is rather obtained by a spliting method, rewriting the wave equation into a product of transport equations, that are solved first for the homogenous transport equation and then for the inhomogenous transport equation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would do something similar, but that's not the homework problem.... I've looked at integrating it, polar coordinates, but to no avail. $\endgroup$ – Bob Dobalina Apr 7 '14 at 1:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.