5
$\begingroup$

we are given the function $F: \mathbb R^3 \to \mathbb R^2$, $F(x,y,z)=\begin{pmatrix} x+yz-z^3-1 \\ x^3-xz+y^3\end{pmatrix}$

Show that around $(1,-1,0)$ we can represent $x$ and $y$ as functions of $z$, and find $\frac{dx}{dz}$ and $\frac{dy}{dz}$

What I did:

The differential of $F$ is:

$\begin{pmatrix} 1 & z &y-3z^2\\3x^2-z & 3y^2 &-x\end{pmatrix}$, insert $x=1,y=-1,z=0$ to get:

$\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 &-1 \\3&3&-1\end{pmatrix}$

The matrix of the partial derivatives with respect to x and y is the first 2 columns, and it is invertible, and so the requirements of the implicit function theorem are met.

How do i find the differential of $x$ and $y$ with respect to $z$ tho?

One would expect that $\frac{dx}{dz} = -\frac{dF}{dz}(\frac{dF}{dx})^{-1}$ but...those are vectors. what is the inverse of a vector? how do you multiply vectors? there's a size mismatch.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The formula $\frac{dx}{dz} = -\frac{dF}{dz}(\frac{dF}{dx})^{-1}$I'm guessing you took it from a theorem that was presented to you or something. If that's the case, can you state the theorem? $\endgroup$ – Git Gud Apr 5 '14 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure, I think it's the chain rule, but in any way, it's the exact same thing you did here math.stackexchange.com/questions/731725/… I thought it might work in other examples as well. I have a big problem with this subject, I also have another open question where my problem is finding the derivative $\endgroup$ – Oria Gruber Apr 5 '14 at 18:43
6
$\begingroup$

The implicit function theorem: Let $m,n$ be natural numbers, $\Omega$ an open subset of $\mathbb R^{n+m}$, $F\colon \Omega\to \mathbb R^m$ a class $C^1$ function and $(a_1, \ldots ,a_n, b_1, \ldots ,b_m)\in \Omega$ such that $$F(a_1, \ldots ,a_n, b_1, \ldots ,b_m)=0_{\mathbb R^{\large m}}.$$ Writing $F=(f_1, \ldots, f_m)$ where for each $k\in \{1, \ldots m\}$, $f_k\colon \mathbb R^{n+m}\to \mathbb R$ is a class $C^1$ function, assume that the following $m\times m$ matrix is invertible: $$\begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial y_1} & \cdots & \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial y_m}\\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ \dfrac{\partial f_m}{\partial y_1} & \cdots& \dfrac{\partial f_m}{\partial y_m}\end{pmatrix}(a_1, \ldots ,a_n, b_1, \ldots ,b_m).$$

In these conditions there exists a neighborhood $V$ of $(a_1, \ldots ,a_n)$, a neighborhood $W$ of $(b_1, \ldots ,b_m)$ and a class $C^1$ function $G\colon V\to W$ such that:

  • $G(a_1, \ldots ,a_n)=(b_1, \ldots ,b_m)$ and
  • $\forall (x_1, \ldots ,x_n)\in V\left(F(x_1, \ldots , x_n, g_1(x_1, \ldots , x_n), \ldots ,g_m(x_1, \ldots , x_n))=0_{\mathbb R^{\large m}}\right)$, where for each $l\in \{1, \ldots , m\}$, $g_l\colon \mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R$ is a class $C^1$ function and $G=(g_1, \ldots ,g_m)$.

Furthermore, $J_G=-\left(J_2\right)^{-1}J_1$ where $$J_G \text{ is } \begin{pmatrix}\dfrac {\partial g_1}{\partial x_1} & \cdots & \dfrac {\partial g_1}{\partial x_n}\\ \vdots &\ddots &\vdots\\ \dfrac {\partial g_m}{\partial x_1} & \cdots & \dfrac {\partial g_m}{\partial x_n} \end{pmatrix}_{m\times n}\\ \text{ evaluated at }(x_1, \ldots ,x_n), \\~\\ J_2\text{ is }\begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial y_1} & \cdots & \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial y_m}\\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ \dfrac{\partial f_m}{\partial y_1} & \cdots& \dfrac{\partial f_m}{\partial y_m}\end{pmatrix}_{m\times m}\\ \text{ evaluated at }(x_1, \ldots , x_n, g_1(x_1, \ldots , x_n), \ldots ,g_m(x_1, \ldots , x_n)),$$ and $$J_1\text{ is }\begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1} & \cdots & \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_n}\\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ \dfrac{\partial f_m}{\partial x_1} & \cdots& \dfrac{\partial f_m}{\partial x_n}\end{pmatrix}_{m\times n}\\ \text{ evaluated at }(x_1, \ldots , x_n, g_1(x_1, \ldots , x_n), \ldots ,g_m(x_1, \ldots , x_n)).$$


In this problem we can't apply the IFT as it is, because to use this version of the IFT one writes the last $m$ variables as functions of the first $n$ ones, but looking at the proof one notices that we can just consider permutations of this and this is what happens here.

In the notation above one has $n=1, m=2, \Omega =\mathbb R^{n+m}, F\colon \mathbb R^{n+m}\to \mathbb R^m$ given by $F(x,y,z)=(f_1(x,y,z), f_2(x,y,z))$, where $f_1(x,y,z)=x+yz-z^3$ and $f_2(x,y,z)=x^3-xz+y^3$.

For all $(x,y,z)\in \mathbb R^3$ it holds that:

  • $\dfrac {\partial f_1}{\partial x}(x,y,z)=1,$
  • $\dfrac {\partial f_1}{\partial y}(x,y,z)=z,$
  • $\dfrac {\partial f_2}{\partial x}(x,y,z)=3x^2-z,$ and
  • $\dfrac {\partial f_2}{\partial y}(x,y,z)=3y^2$.

Therefore $\begin{pmatrix} \dfrac {\partial f_1}{\partial x}(1,-1, 0) & \dfrac {\partial f_1}{\partial y}(1, -1, 0)\\ \dfrac {\partial f_2}{\partial x}(1, -1, 0) & \dfrac {\partial f_2}{\partial y}(1, -1, 0)\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 3 & 3\end{pmatrix}$ and the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 3 & 3\end{pmatrix}$ is invertible.

So, by the IFT, there exists an interval $V$ around $z=0$ and a neighborhood $W$ around $(x,y)=(1,-1)$ and a class $C^1(V)$ function $G\colon V\to W$ such that $G(0)=(1-1)$ and $\forall z\in V\left(F(g_1(z), g_2(z), z)=0\right)$, where $g_1(z), g_2(z)$ denote the first and second entries, respectively, of $G(z)$, for all $z\in V$. (In analyst terms, $g_1(z)=x(z)$ and $g_2(z)=y(z)$).

One also finds

$$ \begin{pmatrix} \dfrac {\partial g_1}{\partial z}(z)\\ \dfrac {\partial g_2}{\partial z}(z) \end{pmatrix}=\\ -\begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial x}(g_1(z), g_2(z), z) & \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial y}(g_1(z), g_2(z), z)\\ \dfrac{\partial f_2}{\partial x}(g_1(z), g_2(z), z) & \dfrac{\partial f_2}{\partial y}(g_1(z), g_2(z), z) \end{pmatrix}^{-1} \begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{\partial f_1}{\partial z}(g_1(z), g_2(z), z)\\ \dfrac{\partial f_2}{\partial z}(g_1(z), g_2(z), z) \end{pmatrix}_. $$

Now you can happily evaluate the RHS at $z=0$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If the variables are $(u,v)$ for $\mathbb{R}^2$ then the map is $$u=x+yz-z^2+1,\\ v=x^3-xz+y^3.\tag{1}$$ Note at the point $(x,y,z)=(1,-1,0)$ these coordinates are $(u,v)=(0,0).$ If it is possible to get $x,y$ implicitly in terms of $z$, then it must be that the variables in $(1)$ are both put to the constant $0$, and then each equation brings the dimension down by one, so the result is a one dimensional part of 3-space. This means one can take both derivatives w.r.t. $z$ and set them to $0$, and get a simultaneous system involving $dx/dz$ and $dy/dz$.

$$(dx/dz)+y+(dy/dz)z-2z=0,\\ 3x^2(dx/dz)-(dx/dz)z-x+3y^2(dy/dz)=0.$$

After moving terms to the right side not involving $dx/dz,\ dy/dz,$ the linear system in terms of $A=dx/dz,\ B=dy/dz$ is $$1 A +z B=-y+2z,\\ (3x^2-z)A+(3y^2)B=x.$$ This system can now be solved for $A,B$ using Cramer's rule.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.