1
$\begingroup$

Let be $A$ a finitely generated (f.g.) abelian group, and let be $T$ its torsion, then by the structure theorem of f.g. abelian gruops we have that $A/T \simeq \mathbb{Z}^d$, so we can define $b$ the rank of the group $A$, denoted $rk(A)$.

We say that a group $G$ (not neceassary abelian) is free if it has a free set of generators, where for "free subset" we mean a subset $X$ of $G$ such that $x_1^{\beta_1} \ldots x_n^{\beta_n}=1$, for $ x_1 \ldots x_n$ distinct elements of $X$, implies $\beta_1= \ldots =\beta_n=0$. Is easy to prove that for a f.g. abelian group the rank is the numer of elements in a free system of generators. Thinking at the structure of f.g. abelian groups we se that if $T=T(A)$ is the torsion of $A$ (f.g. abelian group) and $B \le T$, then $rk(A/B)=rk(A)$.

For $A$ f.g. abelian gruop are equivalent:

  1. $A\simeq \mathbb{Z}^d$.
  2. the torsion subgroup $T(G)$ of $G$ is trivial.
  3. $A$ is free.

Fact1: If $\{ x_1 \ldots x_n \}$ is a free system of generators for a f.g. abelian group $A$, then $rk(A)=n$ and if $A_1=\langle x_1 \ldots x_d\rangle$, with $d \le n$, then $\{ x_1 \ldots x_d \}$ is free set of generators of $A_1$ which have rank $d$. It is easy to prove that $\{ x_{d+1}+A_1 \ldots x_n+A_1 \}$ is free set of generators of $A/A_1$, so in this case we observe that hold $rk(A)=rk(A_1)+rk(A_2)$ with $A_2=A/A_1$.

Now my problem is generalize to a generic f.g. abelian group $A$ and to $A_1$ generic subgroup of $A$, showing that $rk(A)=rk(A_1)+rk(A_2)$ holds, with $A_2=A/A_1$ as before.

First I observed that we can suppose that $A$ is free, replacing $A$ with $A/T$ (T is the torsion of $A$) and $A_1$ with $(A_1+T)/T$. Indeed $rk((A_1+T)/T)=rk(A_1)$, $rk(A/T)=rk(A)$ and because $(A_1+T)/T \le T(A/A_1)$ for our first observation, named $B=(A_1+T)/T$ and $C=(A_1+T)/A_1$, we have that $rk((A/T)/B)=rk(A_2/C)=rk(A_2)$. Now suppose that $A$ is free abelian f.g, then is direct sum of $n=rk(A)$ copies of $\mathbb{Z}$. Taken $A_1 \le A$, is well known (see theorem 10.17 of Introduction of Theory of Groups, Rotman) that, since $A$ is abelian f.g., $A_1$ is free f.g.

Now if we can prove that:

Fact2: exists for $A$ a free system of generators $\{x_1 \ldots x_n\}$ such that $A_1=\langle m_1 x_1 \rangle \times \ldots \times \langle m_k x_k \rangle$ with $k \le n$ (the $\times$ mean, of course, the internal DIRECT product), for suitable choose of $m_i \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \{0\}$

then taken $I=\langle x_1 \rangle \times \ldots \times \langle x_k \rangle$ we have that obviously $rk(A_1)=rk(B)=k$ and because $B/A_1 \le T(A/A_1)$ for our first observations and then we have that $rk(A/A_1)=rk(A/B)=n-k$ and we conclude for fact2.

In this way the problem is reduced to prove the fact2. I have no idea to prove it, I also found this page where the last theorem stated is similar to fact2, but the generators for the subgroup not need to be free, and I don't know how to get a free set generators from a generic set of generators because for a null $\mathbb{Z}$-linear combination $0=\sum m_i x_i$ (the $m_i$ are integers) I can't "isolate" one generator $x_i$, since $\mathbb{Z}$ isn't a field.

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Check the answer here. Fact two is a rather important theorem: math.stackexchange.com/questions/117691/… $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Mar 29 '14 at 11:02
  • $\begingroup$ Great, It was proved exactly what I need, thank you! I spent a lot of time in looking for the proof, It was no easy to prove. $\endgroup$ – Lorban Mar 29 '14 at 20:33
1
$\begingroup$

The rank of a finitely generated abelian group $A$ is the dimension of $A\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q}$ as a vector space over $\mathbb{Q}$. Since $\mathbb{Q}$ is flat as a $\mathbb{Z}$-module, from the exact sequence $$ 0\to A_1\to A\to A/A_1\to 0 $$ you get the exact sequence $$ 0\to A_1\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q} \to A\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q} \to (A/A_1)\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q}\to 0 $$ and you're done.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I never seen tensor product, can you write me a book or an article that introduce tensor products for understanding you answer? Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Lorban Mar 30 '14 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Lorban Any book on module theory, for example Atiyah-McDonald $\endgroup$ – egreg Mar 30 '14 at 16:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.