Is there any difference between $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_\limits{k=1}^{n}a_k$ and $\sum_\limits{k=1}^{\infty}a_k$?

My example and thought:

Let $a_n=n$ where $n\in\mathbb{P}$. $\mathbb{P}$ is the set of all positive integer.

Then $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_k=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}k=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\rightarrow\infty$$



Am I thinking right?

  • $\begingroup$ How do you define $\sum \limits_{k=1}^{\infty}a_k$? $\endgroup$ – Git Gud Mar 23 '14 at 14:34
  • $\begingroup$ @GitGud Sum of all members of ${a_k}$. $\endgroup$ – Novice Mar 23 '14 at 14:35
  • $\begingroup$ That's an infinite sum, it isn't defined. $\endgroup$ – Git Gud Mar 23 '14 at 14:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @GitGud Then, is $\sum \limits_{k=1}^{\infty}a_k$ wrong notation? Or we define $\sum \limits_{k=1}^{\infty}a_k:=\lim \limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum \limits_{k=1}^{n}a_k$? $\endgroup$ – Novice Mar 23 '14 at 14:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Novice, exactly right. Check your books. $\endgroup$ – vonbrand Mar 23 '14 at 15:07

Infinite sums are defined as limits of their partial sums. So in this sense they are equivalent.

What you are using in your example is a Zeta regularization of a divergent series. In that sense, even the equality sign is not really justified. $-1/12$ is not the sum in the traditional sense, it's a generalization and you have to specify what you are doing.

  • $\begingroup$ I'm getting more confusing now. Git Gud said in the comment that infinite sum is not defined, but you are saying that infinite sums are defined as limits of their partial sums, which is $\sum \limits_{k=1}^{\infty}a_k:=\lim \limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum \limits_{k=1}^{n}a_k$. I don't know what zeta regulation is though. I've just read the proof of sum of all natural number is $-1/12$ which has clearly proved. $\endgroup$ – Novice Mar 23 '14 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ The particular sum that you stated is not defined, I'm sure that's what Git meant. In general it is defined as a limit (one of the definitions). If you are not really well versed in mathematics, I suggest that you completely ignore the sum of natural numbers, it will just confuse you. It is evident that it totally diverges in any traditional sense. Regularization works by somehow "subtracting" infinity or "wrap it around" to assign a finite value to some sums. It has meaning in its own field of mathematics, but it doesn't really mean anything in the context of your question. Read up on wiki. $\endgroup$ – orion Mar 23 '14 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I've just read the definition of series, no reason to be a not well versed in mathematics at least in this case. If the sequence of partial sums of $\{a_n\}$; $\{S_n\}$ converges, then we define the infinite series $\sum \limits_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n:=\lim \limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}S_n$. And the sum of all natural number is also derived in traditional way. I've read the proof of it but it was clearly proved without using any contemporary mathematical theories. $\endgroup$ – Novice Mar 23 '14 at 15:35
  • $\begingroup$ Let $S_1:=1-1+1-1+1-\cdots$. We can easily observe that $S_1=1-S_1$, $S_1=1/2$. Now, let $S_2:=1-2+3-4+5-6+7-\cdots$. Then $2S_2=S_1=1/2$, $S_2=1/4$. And let $S:=1+2+3+4+5+6+7+\cdots$. Consider $S-S_2=4S$, then $3S=-S_2=-1/4$. Therefore, $S=-1/12$. $\endgroup$ – Novice Mar 23 '14 at 15:44
  • $\begingroup$ In this case, the "f the sequence of partial sums of {an}; {Sn} converges" does not apply. The series is divergent. If you want to play around with this idea, you can also look at the $1+q+q^2+q^3\cdots=1/(1-q)$ and use $|q|>1$. You are using a series outside its convergence radius (just like with $1+2+3+\cdots$), so in the traditional sense, the sum doesn't exist. You are extrapolating to get a generalized notion of the sum. $\endgroup$ – orion Mar 23 '14 at 16:13

Your example is a red herring; the standard way of interpreting the sum $\sum_{k=1}^\infty k$ is that it diverges to infinity, although there are some theories of divergent series which would assign the sum a different value. In any case, the two limits in your question are exactly equal: an infinite series is defined to be the limit of its partial sums.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.