So far I have my working ...

I think I got wrong ... since after checking with http://calc101.com/webMathematica/partial-fractions.jsp#topdoit

$A = \frac{1}{9}$

$B = - \frac{1}{9}$

$C = - \frac{1}{3}$

Is there a better way to do this than simultaneous equations? Or any tips on how solving such problems ... in a recent exam, I find myself getting a ton of simultaneous equations like below (maybe I need to see "patterns" that make my lefe easier) and likely made careless mistakes within them

  • $\begingroup$ See this answer for a closed formula for partial fraction decomposition. $\endgroup$ – Pierre-Yves Gaillard Oct 13 '11 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ $(2)-(1)$ should be $0=3A+C$ instead of $0=3A-C$. $\endgroup$ – Américo Tavares Oct 13 '11 at 13:24

Once you get to the line with

$$1 = A(x+2)^2+ B(x-1)(x+2) + C(x-1)$$

You can try plugging in x values that simplify things a bunch to solve for the variables. For example, plugging in $x = 1$ or $x = -2$ leaves only one variable to solve for. This is not always possible, but it's a lot simpler than looking at the $x^2$ term and so on, when it is possible.

Plug in $x = -2$ and you get $1 = C(-3)$, so $C = -\frac{1}{3}$. Plug in $x = 1$ and you get $1 = 9A$, so $A = \frac{1}{9}$. Now, you know $A$ and $C$, so you can plug in any other value to get $B$, say, $x = 0$. That gives

$$1 = \frac{1}{9} \cdot 4 - 2B + \frac{1}{3}$$

which gives $B = -\frac{1}{9}$.


As mentioned, there is a sign error is in the calculation of $\:(2)-(1)\:.\:$ As for "better ways" here are a couple remarks. First, eliminate easy things first. Above you have $A + B = 0,\:$ so $B = -A$. Eliminating $B$ yields $\:3\:A + C = 0,\ $ $6\:A-C = 1,\:$ which summed, yields $\:9\:A = 1\:.\:$ Now back-substituting yields $B,C\:.$ Notice how much easier the elimination is using this ordering strategy.

Second, there are well-known tricks that exploit the special structure enjoyed by systems of linear equations that arise from partial fraction decompositions, e.g. see Heaviside's cover-up method. Additionally see my post here which discusses nonlinear generalizations of this method.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.