3
$\begingroup$

Suppose a topological space $X$ does not satisfy the countable chain condition (by that I mean that there exists an uncountable family of pairwise disjoint non-empty open subsets of $X$). Does it follow that there is a sequence of open sets such that their closures form a strictly increasing sequence with respect to inclusion?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you want the sequence to have uncountable length? $\endgroup$ – user642796 Mar 21 '14 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ No, by a sequence I mean a countable sequence. $\endgroup$ – Bach Mar 21 '14 at 10:25
2
$\begingroup$

Suppose you have any space $X$ in which there are pairwise disjoint nonempty open sets $\{ U_i : i \in \mathbb{N} \}$. I claim that $\langle \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_i \rangle_{n =1}^\infty$ is as required:

Given $n \geq 1$, note that $U_{n+1} \cap \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_i = \varnothing$, and so $U_{n+1} \cap \overline{ \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_i } = \varnothing$ (since $U_{n+1}$ is open, it is a witness for each $x \in U_{n+1}$ that $x \notin \overline{ \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_i }$), which implies that $\overline{ \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_i } \subsetneq \overline{ \bigcup_{i=1}^{n+1} U_i }$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So according to this, much less then not having c.c.c. should suffice, right? $\endgroup$ – Bach Mar 21 '14 at 10:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Bach: Yes. Something must much less: I just assume that there is a countable family of pairwise disjoint nonempty open sets. $\endgroup$ – user642796 Mar 21 '14 at 11:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ArthurFischer which holds in every infinite Hausdorff space. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Mar 21 '14 at 21:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.