Let $\sigma(x)$ be the sum of the divisors of the positive integer $x$.

If $\sigma(M) = 2M$, then $M$ is said to be perfect.

Currently, there are $49$ known examples of even perfect numbers -- on the other hand, we still do not know whether there are any odd perfect numbers.

Euler derived the general form that an odd perfect number $N$ must take:

$$N = {q^k}{n^2},$$

where $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(q,n) = 1$. We call $q$ the Euler prime of $N$.

Descartes, Frenicle and subsequently Sorli conjectured that $k = 1$.

In [Dris, 2012], it was shown that the implications

$$n < q \Longrightarrow k = 1$$ and $$n < q^2 \Longrightarrow k = 1$$

are true.

Now, note that, since $q$ and $\sigma(q) = q + 1$ are consecutive integers, then the following implications are true.

Case 1: $q^k < n < \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n) \Longrightarrow k > 1$

Case 2: $n < q^k < \sigma(n) < \sigma(q^k) \Longrightarrow k > 1$

The remaining cases to be considered are:

Case 3: $q^k < \sigma(q^k) < n < \sigma(n) \land k \geq 1$

Case 4: $n < \sigma(n) < q^k < \sigma(q^k) \land k \geq 1$

Case 5: $n < q^k \leq \sigma(n) < \sigma(q^k) \land k \geq 1$

Case 6: $n < q^k < \sigma(q^k) \leq \sigma(n) \land k \geq 1$

Am I right in thinking that it is possible to prove the following implication, given the above cases?

CLAIM: If $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ is an odd perfect number given in Eulerian form, then $$n < q^{k + 1} \Longrightarrow k \neq 1.$$

Easy to prove for Cases 1 and 2. Should also be doable for the rest. Anybody have any ideas?

Added September 12 2016

From one of the answers below, it can be shown that the condition $q^2 < n$ is equivalent to the truth of the implication $$n < q^{k + 1} \Longrightarrow k \neq 1.$$


Let $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ be an odd perfect number given in Eulerian form. Let $$I(x) = \dfrac{\sigma(x)}{x}$$ be the abundancy index of $x$.

This is a partial answer to the original question, and proves the claim in the affirmative, subject to the validity of a recent proof claim by Patrick A. Brown that $q^k < n$ holds (in many cases).

First, we show the following lemmas:

Lemma 1. $$I(q^k) + I(n) < \dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} + \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k} \implies \left(q^k < n \iff \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n)\right)$$

Proof. $$I(q^k) + I(n) < \dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} + \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k} \implies \left(n - q^k\right)\left(\sigma(q^k) - \sigma(n)\right) < 0 \implies \left(q^k < n \iff \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n)\right)$$ QED

Lemma 2. $$\dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} + \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k} < I(q^k) + I(n) \implies \left(q^k < n \iff \sigma(n) < \sigma(q^k)\right)$$

Proof. $$\dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} + \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k} < I(q^k) + I(n) \implies \left(q^k - n\right)\left(\sigma(q^k) - \sigma(n)\right) < 0 \implies \left(n < q^k \iff \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n)\right)$$ QED

Lemma 3. $$I(q^k) + I(n) = \dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} + \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k} \iff \sigma(q^k) = \sigma(n)$$

Proof. $$I(q^k) + I(n) = \dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} + \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k} \iff \left(q^k - n\right)\left(\sigma(q^k) - \sigma(n)\right) = 0 \iff \sigma(q^k) = \sigma(n)$$ since $q^k \neq n$.


We are now ready to prove the following proposition:

Proposition 1. $$q^k < n \iff \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n) \iff \dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} < \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k}$$

Proof. Since $I(q^k) < \sqrt[3]{2} < I(n)$ [Dris, 2012], then $\sigma(q^k) = \sigma(n) \implies n < q^k$. So it suffices to consider the remaining case under Lemma 2. It thus remains to consider $n < q^k < \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n).$ But these are already ruled out, assuming Brown's proof for $q^k < n$ is successfully completed.

Therefore, we are left with the case under Lemma 1. It follows that $$q^k < n \iff \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n) \iff \dfrac{\sigma(q^k)}{n} < \dfrac{\sigma(n)}{q^k}.$$ QED

Next, we prove the following proposition:

Proposition 2. $$k = 1 \implies \sigma(q^k) < n$$

Proof. We use Proposition 1 to list all possible permutations of the set $\left\{q^k, n, \sigma(q^k), \sigma(n)\right\}$.

So we have $$\bf{A}: q^k < n < \sigma(q^k) < \sigma(n)$$ $$\bf{B}: q^k < \sigma(q^k) < n < \sigma(n)$$ $$\bf{C}: n < q^k < \sigma(n) < \sigma(q^k)$$ $$\bf{D}: n < \sigma(n) \leq q^k < \sigma(q^k)$$

(Notice that $\sigma(q^k) \neq n$ since $\sigma(q^k) \equiv k+1 \equiv 2 \pmod 4$ while $n$ is odd.)

Note that Brown's result rules out cases $\bf{C}$ and $\bf{D}$.

Now, $k = 1$ rules out case $\bf{A}$.

Therefore, under the assumption $k = 1$, we are left with case $\bf{B}$.


We are left with proving the following lemma.

"Lemma 4". $$n < \sigma(q^k) \iff n < q^{k+1}$$

"Proof". $n < \sigma(q^k) < q^{k+1}$ since $I(q^k) < \dfrac{5}{4} < 5 \leq q$. Hence, $n < \sigma(q^k) \implies n < q^{k+1}$.

It now remains to show that $n < q^{k+1} \implies n < \sigma(q^k)$.


We now get the following "Theorem":

"Theorem". $n < q^{k+1} \implies k \neq 1$

Proof. Take the contrapositive of Proposition 2, and use "Lemma 4".


In particular, by noting that $n < q^2 \implies k = 1$ is true, we obtain the following "Corollary":


$q^2 < n$

Added September 08 2016 I just realized today that we actually have the following biconditional: $$q^2 < n \iff \left\{n<q^{k+1} \implies k>1\right\}$$


Let me post another answer to this question, to collect some more thoughts regarding this problem.

The remaining cases to be considered are:

Case 3: $q^k < \sigma(q^k) < n < \sigma(n) \land k \geq 1$

Case 4: $n < \sigma(n) < q^k < \sigma(q^k) \land k \geq 1$

Case 5: $n < q^k \leq \sigma(n) < \sigma(q^k) \land k \geq 1$

Case 6: $n < q^k < \sigma(q^k) \leq \sigma(n) \land k \geq 1$

Since $q < n$ has already been proved by Brown, this means that $k > 1$ follows from Cases 4, 5, and 6.

Note that $k > 1$ also follows from Cases 1 and 2.

Let us now consider Case 3. From Proposition 2 in the first answer, we have the following implication: $$k=1 \implies \sigma(q^k)<n$$

Under Case 3, this implication is trivially true. Additionally, if $k>1$, then the same implication is also vacuously true.

Since $k>1$ is sure to hold for all cases except Case 3, I am led to predict that:

Conjecture If $N=q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with Euler prime $q$, then $k>1$ holds.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.