I've read (in joy of cats) that every topological space is a regular quotient of a zero-dimensional hausdorff space. So far, I could not find a proof. Do you know one, or a reference?
-
1$\begingroup$ For the record: the claim is on p. 215, Example 12.11. $\endgroup$ – Zhen Lin Oct 9 '11 at 12:16
-
$\begingroup$ By a regular quotient you mean regular epimorphism, which is in the category Top quotient map? $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak Oct 10 '11 at 10:16
-
$\begingroup$ Yes, this is the correct definition. $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Oct 10 '11 at 19:15
I will assume that by regular quotient you mean existence of regular epimorphism (in Top), i.e. of a quotient map. I hope I did not overlook something. (The proof seems to be relatively easy.)
Let us say that $X$ is a prime space if it has only one non-isolated point.
If $a\in X$, then the prime factor $X_a$ of $X$ at $a$ is the space which has the same neighborhoods of $a$ as $X$ and all points other than $a$ are isolated.
It is easy to see that:
Every topological space is a quotient of a sum of its prime factors.
A prime factor is either discrete or prime space.
Discrete spaces are obviously zero-dimensional, Hausdorff prime space are zero-dimensional and a sum of Hausdorff zero-dimensional spaces is zero-dimensional. Therefore it is sufficient to show that every prime space can be obtained as a quotient of a sum of Hausdorff zero-dimensional spaces.
Suppose that a prime space $X$ with the accumulation point $a$ is non-Hausdorff. Let $C$ be an intersection of all neighborhoods of $a$. Then the space $X$ can be obtained as a quotient of a sum of:
the space $X\setminus C\cup\{a\}$ (which is a prime Hausdorff space);
several copies of Sierpinski space, one for each point of $C\setminus \{a\}$.
Now our problem reduces to obtaining Sierpinski space as a quotient of a Hausdorff prime space, which is easy. (There are many possibilities, e.g. you can obtain is as a quotient of $\{0\}\cup\{\frac1n;n\in\mathbb N\}$ with the topology inherited from $\mathbb R$.)
I use the term prime factor and prime space in the same way as in the following papers. (Although I do not claim that Franklin and Rajagopalan were the first ones to use these notions.)
Franklin S.P., Rajagopalan M., On subsequential spaces, Topology Appl. 35 (1990), 1--19.
Zhou J.-Y., On subspaces of pseudo-radial spaces, Comment.Math.Univ.Carolinae 34,3 (1993), 583--586