1
$\begingroup$

Is there a standard notation for multiplication in reverse order? For example consider the problem

$$x_{k+1} = A_k x_k$$

where $x_i \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $A_i \in M_n(\mathbb{R})$, ($i=0,1,2,\dots$) without any further assumptions on $A_i$. The solution to this problem is

$$x_k = A_{k-1} \dots A_1 A_0 x_0$$

Obviously, writing

$$x_k = \prod_{i=0}^{k-1} A_i x_0$$

is wrong because of the multiplication order. But I'm also unconfortable to use

$$x_k = \prod_{i=k-1}^{0} A_i x_0$$

as the notation suggests that we need to increment $i$, not decrement it. Also, one may need to write $\prod_{i=k}^{m} A_i$. Then, we need to explicitly state $m < k$ to imply ordering.

I can always write the open form but as similar products frequently occur in calculations in my work I want to express them in a more compact way. The question is, is there a standard and nice notation to do so? There are some suggestions in this question, but I think none of them are "nice enough" to work with.

I came up with the notation

$$x_k = \coprod_{i=k-1}^{0} A_i x_0$$

to imply decrementing $i$ rather than increment it, but I don't know if it is used in somewhere else or there is a standard notation.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

$$x_k = \prod_{i=0}^{k-1} A_{k-i-1} x_0$$

(You seem to be fixated on putting things in the bounds of the operator rather than in the operand.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.