Hyperoperations and Peano's arithmetic ($\mathsf{PA}$) I am very confused about the "role of the hyperoperations" in the Peano arithmetic. 
For example addition's and multiplication's axioms are given.

$A_1$ $\forall x(x+0=x)$
$A_2$ $\forall xy(x+ S(y)=S(x+y))$
$M_1$ $\forall x(x\times0=0)$
$M_2$ $\forall xy(x\times S(y)=x+(x\times y))$

with multiplication we can define exponentiation

$E_1$ $\forall x(x^0=1)$
$E_2$ $\forall xy(x^{ S(y)}=x\times(x^ y))$

...

$\mathcal Q_1$ but exponentiation's axioms are not given in $\mathsf{PA}$... why?

My possible ideas are:


*

*(1) because in $\mathsf{PA}$ we just don't need (are not interested in) exponentiation or

*(2) we need it but but addition's and multiplication's axioms are enough to get it.
If the statement (2) is right then why we need multiplication's axioms?

$\mathcal Q_2$ Seems to mee so weird that now I'm starting to think that probably I
  am missing something about $\mathsf{PA}$ and how axioms and first
  order theories works...what am I missing?

But if my first interpretation (1) is right and we don't need/have exponentiation in $\mathsf{PA}$ then ...

$\mathcal Q_3$ what we obtain if we add infinite axioms for all the
  hyperoperations left (higher than multiplication) ?

The axioms are the following

$K_1$ $\forall xy(x \uparrow ^{0}y=x \times y)$
$K_2$ $\forall xz(x\uparrow^{S(z)}0=1)$
$K_3$ $\forall xyz(x\uparrow^{S(z)}S(y)=x\uparrow^{z}(x\uparrow^{S(z)}y))$

 A: Every recursive function is representable in Peano Arithmetic. Roughly speaking this means that for every recursive function $f(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)$, there is a formula $F_f(y,x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)$ such that $F_f(y,x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)$ "says" that $y=f(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)$. Somewhat more precisely, for any natural numbers $b,a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n$, the sentence $F_f(\bar{b},\bar{a}_1,\bar{a}_2,\dots,\bar{a}_n)$ is provable if and only if $b=f(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n)$. Here $\bar{b}$, $\bar{a}_i$ are the formal expressions corresponding to $b$, $a_i$. These are successor function applied the appropriate number of times to the constant symbol $\bar{0}$.
Additionally, in Peano Arithmetic it is a theorem that for every $x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n$ there is a unique $y$ such that $F_f(y,x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)$. There are always infinitely many $F_f$ that "represent" the function $f$. 
Exponentiation is a recursive function, you have essentially given a recursive description of it. Thus exponentiation is representable in PA. So are the other hyperoperations mentioned in the question. 
The corresponding result is false if we start only with addition. Multiplication is not representable in the resulting theory, which is usually called Presburger Arithmetic. 
