2
$\begingroup$

If we let $K$ be a field and $GL(n,K)$ act by right multiplication on the $1$-dim subspaces of $K^n$.

Then if we take $\langle v_1 \rangle, \ldots \langle v_n \rangle \in K^n$ distinct and $\langle w_1 \rangle, \ldots \langle w_n \rangle \in K^n$ again distinct.

Then $v_1, \ldots , v_n$ forms a basis of $K^n$ as does $w_1, \ldots , w_n$.

So we know that there is an invertible map $f:K^n \rightarrow K^n$ for which $v_i^m = w_i$ for $1 \leq i \leq n$ with $m \in GL(n,K)$ and moreover $\langle v_n \rangle ^m = \langle w_i \rangle$ hence $GL(n,K)$ acts n-transitively.

Is the above correct?

Thanks for any help.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Distinct $1$-dimensional subspaces are not necessarily linearly independent. E.g. consider the lines $(1,0)$, $(0,1)$, and $(1,1)$ in $\mathbb R^2$. $\endgroup$ – Dustan Levenstein Mar 4 '14 at 10:44
  • $\begingroup$ ^ Or $(1,0,0)$, $(0,1,0)$ and $(1,1,0)$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$. $\endgroup$ – Casteels Mar 4 '14 at 10:48
  • $\begingroup$ That's kind of the right idea, but there's a small problem. Just because the $1$-dimensional subspaces are distinct doesn't necessarily imply that they are linearly independent: e.g. take $\langle (1, 0, 0) \rangle, \langle (0, 1, 0) \rangle, \langle (1, 1, 0) \rangle < \Bbb{R}^3$. $\endgroup$ – Sammy Black Mar 4 '14 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ @DustanLevenstein of course. So I could prove that it is $2$-transitive this way. Can I modify this to show that it acts n-transitively or is this just false? $\endgroup$ – hmmmm Mar 4 '14 at 10:53
  • $\begingroup$ It's false because a basis in $n$-dimensional space cannot be sent to a linearly dependent distinct set of $n$ lines, which exists for $n>2$. $\endgroup$ – Dustan Levenstein Mar 4 '14 at 11:58
1
$\begingroup$

From the comments above the proof is wrong because if $\langle v_1 \rangle \ldots \langle v_n\rangle$ are distinct it does not follow that all of these spaces are linearly independent.

Moreover the claim is false. We have that $GL(n,K)$ acts 3-transitively iff $n=2$ and hence $GL(3,K)$ does not act $3$ transitively.

To show that $GL(n,K)$ does not act $3$-transitively for $n\geq 3$ suppose that it was.

Then we can take $\langle v_1\rangle, \langle v_2\rangle , \langle v_3 \rangle \in K^n$ all distinct and linearly independent (as $n\geq 3$)

We can then also choose take $\langle v_1\rangle, \langle v_2\rangle, \langle v_1+v_2\rangle$ which are all distinct but no longer independent.

Then we have to have $g\in GL(n,K)$ with $v_1^g=\lambda_1 v_1$, $v_2^g=\lambda_2$ and $v_3^g=\lambda_3(v_1+v_2)$ but as $g$ is invertible this will give a contradiction

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @DerekHolt I'm sorry what can? $\endgroup$ – hmmmm Mar 4 '14 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ That was a comment on a (now deleted) erroneous comment by me. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Mar 4 '14 at 13:29
  • $\begingroup$ @TobiasKildetoft ah ok cool thanks $\endgroup$ – hmmmm Mar 4 '14 at 13:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.