let $H$ be a Hilbert space and let M be a dense linear subspace of H. Can we find a complete orthonormal set $\{u_{\alpha}: \alpha \in A\}$ for H in M?

I think the answer is negative in general, but I cannot find a counterexample. Thank you very much in advance for your help.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ most probably we can... but I dont know if that works without choice axiom if $H$ is not separable. $\endgroup$ – Max Mar 3 '14 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ Have you tried Gram-Schmidt in the separable case? $\endgroup$ – gerw Mar 3 '14 at 18:52
  • $\begingroup$ I'm inclined to agree with Max. $\endgroup$ – Robert Lewis Mar 3 '14 at 18:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Obviously, if H is separable, the Gram-Schmidt procedure gives an affirmative answer. $\endgroup$ – Maurizio Barbato Mar 3 '14 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ This discussion came up in a previous question. math.stackexchange.com/questions/201119/… . One of the contributors gave a counterexample for the non-separable case. $\endgroup$ – DisintegratingByParts Mar 6 '14 at 4:08

Your question is equivalent to the following: does every pre-Hilbert space (= inner product space) $M$ admit an orthonormal basis?

It turns out that the answer is "no". A counter-example can be found in N. Bourbaki's Topological Vector Spaces, Exercise V.2.2.

I tried to solve the exercise, but I'm not quite sure that I understood it.

Let $H_1=\ell_2(\mathbb N)$, and $H_2=\ell_2(I)$, where $I$ is a set with cardinality $\mathfrak c$ (the continuum). Choose a linearly independent family $(x_i)_{i\in I}\subset H_1$ and an orthonormal basis $(e_i)_{i\in I}$ of $H_2$. Now let $H:=H_1\oplus H_2$ and $M:={\rm span}\,\{ x_i\oplus e_i;\; i\in I\}\subset H$. Let us try to show that $M$ admits no orthonormal basis.

First, note that, identifying $H_2$ with $\{ 0\} \oplus H_2\subset H$, we have $M\cap H_2=\{ 0\}$. This is rather easy to check using that fact that the $x_i$ are linearly independent.

Now, let us show that any orthonormal family $\mathcal Z\subset M$ is countable. To see this, choose an orthonormal basis $(f_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$ of $H_1=\ell_2(\mathbb N)\subset H$ and observe that for any $n\in\mathbb N$, we have $\langle f_n, z\rangle=0$ for all but countably many $z\in\mathcal Z$, because $\sum_{z\in\mathcal Z}\vert \langle f_n,z\rangle\vert^2<\infty$. Since by the previous remark, any $z\in\mathcal Z$ must satisfy $\langle f_n ,z\rangle\neq 0$ for at least one $n\in\mathbb N$ (otherwise we would have $z\in H_1^{\perp}=H_2$ and hence $z=0$), it follows that $\mathcal Z$ must be countable. Indeed, we have $\mathcal Z=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N} \mathcal Z_n$, where $\mathcal Z_n=\{ z;\; \langle f_n,z\rangle\neq 0\}$ is countable for each $n$.

It follows that if $M$ were to admit an orthonormal basis, then it would be separable. But this is not possible because $\pi_2(M)$ is dense in $H_2$ (since it contains all the vectors $e_i$) and $H_2$ is not separable.

  • $\begingroup$ This looks pretty good to me too, but then what do I know? Anyway, +1! $\endgroup$ – Robert Lewis Mar 4 '14 at 0:19
  • $\begingroup$ Your proof looks fine to me too. Nice example! $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Mar 4 '14 at 0:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. One can find many nice things in Bourbaki's exercises... $\endgroup$ – Etienne Mar 4 '14 at 2:06
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, very very much for your fantastic example, Etienne. I checked it in all the details carefully, and it is perfectly correct! As I supposed, the answer was negative in general. $\endgroup$ – Maurizio Barbato Mar 4 '14 at 15:13
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, nonseparable spaces are sometimes strange objects... Glad that you found the answer useful! $\endgroup$ – Etienne Mar 4 '14 at 15:30

consider $X:=\left\{A\in\mathcal{P}\left(M\right): A \text{ is an ON-System }\right\}$ and $\subseteq$. Obviously each partially ordered chain $C$ has an upper bound in $X$: simply consider $\cup_{a\in C}a$. By Zorn we get that there exists at least one maximal element of $X$. Take the maximal element, by definition it's an orthonormal Hilbert-basis.

see comments. i will not delete this. (for documentation)

  • $\begingroup$ That looks right, +1! Close to my thoughts on the matter, in any event; that's probably why it looks right to me! ;-) Will get back if I have any further ideas. $\endgroup$ – Robert Lewis Mar 3 '14 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ i had to edit, there is an important point missing. $\endgroup$ – Max Mar 3 '14 at 19:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How is $M$ a subspace? $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Mar 3 '14 at 19:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Daniel: then it wouldnt be dense (if its not in the orthogonal but somewhere else project it to the orthogonal of the span of the vectors of the maximal elements. it' s in $M$ by definition) $\endgroup$ – Max Mar 3 '14 at 20:18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No. Consider $M\subset \ell^2$ the dense subspace of all sequences with only finitely many nonzero terms. Let $\xi = (\frac{1}{n+1})$, and $K = \langle\xi\rangle^\perp \cap M$. Take the system $(n+1)\cdot e_n-(n+2)\cdot e_{n+1}$ in $K$ and orthonormalise it. A maximal orthonormal subset of $M$ containing that system is contained in $\langle\xi\rangle^\perp$. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Mar 3 '14 at 20:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.