8
$\begingroup$

Hilbert-Schmidt Integral operators are usually defined from $H=L_2[a,b]$ into $H=L_2[a,b]$ as $$(Tf)(x) = \int_a^b K(x,y)f(y) dy,$$

provided that $K(x,y)$ is a Hilbert Schmidt kernel, namely
$$\int_a^b \int_a^b |K(x,y)|^2dx dy < \infty.$$

I was wondering if the following extension is used with the same name. Letting $H_1 = L_2[a,b]$, $H_2=L_2[c,d]$, and
$$\int_a^b \int_c^d |K(x,y)|^2dx dy < \infty,$$

consider the integral operators $T_1:H_2 \rightarrow H_1$ and $T_2:H_1 \rightarrow H_2$ $$(T_1 f)(x) = \int_c^d K(x,y)f(y) dy,$$ $$(T_2 f)(y) = \int_a^b K(x,y)g(x) dx.$$ Can one still call these operators and corresponding kernel of Hilbert-Schmidt type?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The abstract definition of Hilbert-Schmidt operators on a Hilbert space $H$ is that for a complete orthonormal set $A$ a bounded operator $$ T: H \to H $$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if $$ \sum_{a \in A} \| T a \|^2 \lt \infty $$ We can, of course, without problems say that we actually have two different, but isomorphic, Hilbert spaces $H_1$ and $H_2$ and reformulate the definition for $$ T: H_1 \to H_2 $$ which would not change anything (definitions nor theorems) besides additional indexes. So, yes, I think one can and should talk about Hilbert-Schmidt operators in your example.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are Hilbert Schmidt operators the same as Hilbert Schmidt Integral operators? $\endgroup$ – Tyler Hilton Oct 18 '13 at 22:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.