Recall that every finite-dimensional rational representation of $GL_n$ is of the form $(\det)^{-k} \varrho$ for some integer $k\geq 0$ and polynomial representation $\varrho$ (and $\det$ is the one-dimensional representation $A\mapsto \det(A)$). The irreducible polynomial representations have been classified and are given by the Schur modules.

My questions are as follows. Are there simply-described finite-dimensional non-rational representations of $GL_n$? Are there a lot of them? Can they be classified? Also, why do we care about polynomial representations in the first place?


2 Answers 2


There are some pathological examples given in the Appendix of Stanley - Enumerative Combinatorics, vol 2. I'll share some that are relevant to the question:

Let $A \in GL(n,\mathbb{C})$.

  • $\varphi(A) = |\det(A)|^{\sqrt{2}}$ is a representation of dimension one that is not a rational representation.
  • $\varphi(A) = [\sigma(a_{ij})]$ with $\sigma$ a field automorphism of $\mathbb{C}$ that is not the identity or complex conjugation (and so it must be discontinuous). This is a $n$-dimensional representation that is not rational and not continuous.
  • $\varphi(A) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & \log|det A | \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$. This is a representation of dimension two that is not rational, but is continuous.

I don't know of an answer to the question of classification. But altogether, we learn

  • Yes, in some sense there are a lot of non-rational finite-dimensional representations that are simple to describe.
  • Perhaps the above examples hint at some ways to classify at least some families (but there's no indication that we can complete this fully).

The problem with $GL(V)$ simply as a group is that it is to big and has a lot of wild representations. For example, the field $\mathbb{C}$ has a lot of field automorphisms, using them you can twist any normal representation and obtain some strange one. So you need to add some additional structure on $GL(V)$ that you want to preserve.

Study of polynomial representations corresponds to understanding the $GL(V)$ group as an algebraic group. This is the natural choice if you want to have a theory over arbitrary (characteristic zero, algebraically closed) field. There are other versions of classification. For example, you can understand $GL_n$ as a Lie group and study holomorphic representations. The results would not change. There are a lot of results of the type "continuous representations of $U(n)$ extend to algebraic representations of $GL(n)$". So, in general, the Schur-Weil theory extends for any reasonable additional structure.

Unfortunately, I don't know the examples of ``weird'' continuous representations, but intuitevely I am confident that they do exist. For me, the representation $|det|^{\pi}$ is weird enough.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.