7
$\begingroup$

A nearring is a ring-like structure $R$ such that

  • $(R, +, 0)$ is a group (possibly non-abelian)
  • $(R, \cdot)$ is a semigroup
  • $(x+y)\,z=xz+yz$ (right-distributivity)

In other words, three conditions that may fail differ it from an actual ring:

  1. Addition may be non-commutative
  2. There may be no multiplicative identity
  3. Left-distributivity may fail

It's easy enough to give examples of nearrings for which arbitrary subsets of these 3 conditions nevertheless hold, except for (2)+(3) and pure (3). It is well-known that existence of identity and two-sided distributivity implies (1), so (2)+(3) without (1) is impossible. What about pure (3)?

Question: are there fully distributive nearrings with non-abelian additive subgroups?

Some thoughts:

Such nearrings are necessarily pretty weird. Adapting the usual proof that (2)+(3) implies (1), we can argue that $$ a\,((x+y)-(y+x))=0 $$ for all $x,y,z\in R$. This seems a pretty strong condition, even though lack of multiplicative identity does not allow us to conclude immediately $x+y=y+x$.

Definition Let left-distributing element be $a\in R$ such that $a(x+y)=ax+ay$ for all $x, y\in R$

All nearrings are isomprhic to subsets of $M(G)$ - nearring of functions from group $G$ to itself with pointwise addition and composition as multiplication. Left-distributing elements are precisely endomorphisms. Still, set of endomorphisms does contain identity (likely minor obstacle), and for nonabelian $G$ is not a sub-nearring of $R$ (major problem). Product of left-distributing elements is left-distributing, but sum of left-distributing elements may fail to be, so the sub-nearring generated by endomorphisms in general most likely does not satisfy (3). Sub-nearring generated by endomorphisms mapping $G$ to $Z(G)$ would do the trick, but addition would be abelian.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Consider the dihedral group $D_4=\langle a,b :a^4, b^2, (ab)^2\rangle$. Define $x+y=xy$ and $x\cdot y=[x,y]$. Claim: $(D_4,+,\cdot)$ is a distributive near-ring.

Recall commutator identities $[xy,z]=[x,z]^y[y,z]$ and $[z,xy]=[z,y][z,x]^y$. Note that the commutator subgroup coincides with the center. So we have $[xy,z]=[x,z][y,z]$ and $[z,xy]=[z,y][z,x]=[z,x][z,y]$. This translates to $(x+y)\cdot z=x\cdot z+y\cdot z$ and $z\cdot(x+y)=z\cdot x+z\cdot y$.

More generally, this works for any group of nilpotence class 2. For more info see this paper: Heatherly, H. E. Distributive near-rings. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 24 (1973), 63–70.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.