4
$\begingroup$

Denote by $C_{[0,1]}$ the ternary Cantor set on $[0,1]$. Now consider $[0,1] \setminus C_{[0,1]}$. It contains open intervals. Now define Cantor sets on all these open intervals by simply translating and dilating the standard Cantor set. Denote them as $C_{[a_i,b_i]}$. Now is the set $F=C_{[0,1]} \cup \bigcup C_{[a_i,b_i]}$ closed?

My try: I wanted to show that its complement is open. I argued that the complement of F consists of open intervals. So $F^c$ consists of unions of open intervals. Hence $F$ is closed. But my professor says it is not so. Can any one please tell me where I am going wrong. Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Did your professor tell you that your argument isn't good, or that F is not closed (because it seems it is close)? $\endgroup$ – Ofir Mar 15 '14 at 11:00
2
$\begingroup$

There are several ways to interpret this question. I will use (mainly) the following interpretation: For each (open) complementary interval $I_j$ of the standard Cantor set $C\subset J=[0,1]$ consider the canonical (increasing) affine bijection $f_j: I_j \to I=(0,1)$. Define $C_j:= f_j^{-1}(C)$ (note that this subset is not closed in $J$, however, it becomes closed if we add to it the end-points of the interval $I_j$, which are elements of $C$). Next, define $$ K:= C\cup \bigcup_{j} C_j. $$

Lemma. The set $K$ is closed in $J$.

Proof. Let us identify the complement $U=J\setminus K$. It is the union of the sets $$ U_j= I_j\setminus C_j $$ each of which is open in $J$ (as $C_j$ is closed in $I_j$ and $I_j$ is open in $J$). Note that the fact that $C_j$ is not closed in $J$ is irrelevant here. Therefore, $J\setminus K$ is open and, hence, $K$ is closed in $I$. qed

Note that, by construction, $K$ is also a perfect totally disconnected set, hence, $K$ is homeomorphic to $C$.

Here is another possible interpretation of the question: On step 1 apply the above construction to the standard Cantor set $C$ and denote the resulting set $K_1\subset J$. Now, apply the same construction to $K_1$ and obtain a new set $K_2$, etc. One, thus, obtains an increasing union of sets $K_m$ each homeomorphic to the Cantor set. Since the maximal length of complementary intervals to $K_m$ tends to zero as $m\to \infty$, the union $$ K_\infty= \bigcup_{m} K_m $$ is dense in $[0,1]$. On the other hand, $K_\infty$ has empty interior (Baire's theorem). Hence, $K_\infty$ is not closed.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.