1
$\begingroup$

I would appreciate a hint regarding the following question (taken from Durret, Essentials of Stochastic Processes, questions 2.38

"Let $S_t$ be the price of stock at time t and suppose that at times of a Poisson process with rate  the price is multiplied by a random variable $X_i$ > 0 with mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. That is,

$S_t = S_0\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)}X_i$

where the product is 1 if $N(t) = 0$. Find ES(t)/ and varS(t).

Is this an example of thinning?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ No. This has nothing to do with thinning. You need to take conditional expectation with respect to N(t) to get the mean and conditional variance formula to get the variance. $\endgroup$ – Lost1 Feb 27 '14 at 0:37
8
$\begingroup$

You start by the conditional expectation with respect to $N_t$.

$E[S_t|N_t] = S_0\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} EX_i$ with the additional hypothesis that the process $N$ and the $X_i$s are independent, so

$$E[S_t|N_t] = S_0 \mu^{N(t)} $$

Let $r$ be the rate of the Poisson process, we have $$E[S_t] = EE[S_t|N_t] = S_0 \exp(-rt)\sum_{k=0}^\infty \mu^{k}\frac{(rt)^k}{k!} = S_0 \exp(rt(\mu-1))$$

We also have via the same computation: $$E[S_t^2] = E[S_0^2 (\sigma^2 + \mu^2)^N_t] = S_0^2 \exp(rt(\sigma^2 + \mu^2 - 1))$$

so $Var[S_t] = S_0^2 (\exp(rt(\sigma^2 + \mu^2 - 1)) - \exp(2rt(\mu-1)))$

One can actually compute the characteristic function of such a process (in terms of the characteristic function of the $X_i$s), this is a simple case of the Lévy–Khintchin representation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hello, I downvoted your answer. This is not because I think it is a bad answer, but on this site, it is the norm that people do not give answers to questions which shows no attempt. This, imo, can easily be a homework question and the OP showed no attempt at it. This is why I left a comment below the question on something to look at, but I did not post answer myself. I hope you can understand. $\endgroup$ – Lost1 Feb 27 '14 at 0:49
  • $\begingroup$ Sure. Thank you for your comment. $\endgroup$ – mookid Feb 27 '14 at 1:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Lost1 shouldn't you actually downvote the question, then? The answer is useful to others who will eventually reach this page when searching for help in similar problems. $\endgroup$ – Andre Terra Jan 28 '16 at 23:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AndréTerra that goes without saying... $\endgroup$ – Lost1 Jan 29 '16 at 9:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why do you have that $E[S_{t}^{2}] = E[S_{0}^{2}(\sigma^{2} + \mu^{2})^{N(t)}$ and not $E[S_{t}^{2}] = E[(S_{0}\mu^{N(t)})^{2}] = E[(S_{0}^{2}\mu^{2N(t)})]$? $\endgroup$ – sir_thursday Mar 14 '16 at 21:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.