17
$\begingroup$

Let $A = \{x \sin x : x \in \mathbb{Z}\} \subset \mathbb{R}$. Is $A$ a ring under the usual addition and multiplication operations of $\mathbb{R}$? It looks like it's not, but I can't find something concrete to justify this.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Under what operations ? The usual ones in $\;\Bbb R\;$ ? $\endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 25, 2014 at 16:36
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Is this even closed under negation? After all, $(-x)\sin(-x) = x\sin x$ because $\sin x = -\sin (-x)$... $\endgroup$
    – fgp
    Feb 25, 2014 at 16:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's not immediately clear why there isn't some $y\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $y\sin{y}=-x\sin{x}$ though (I agree that this is unlikely). $\endgroup$
    – mdp
    Feb 25, 2014 at 16:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To take things even further (and actually possibly point to a proof): is there even one non-trivial identity among some finite number of members of $A$? $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2014 at 17:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Another identity is that $f(1 \sin 1, 2 \sin 2) = 0$ where $$f(x,y) = y^2 - 8 x^2 (1-x^2) (1-2x^2)^2$$ $\endgroup$
    – user14972
    Feb 25, 2014 at 17:32

2 Answers 2

14
$\begingroup$

Suppose $A$ were a ring; then in particular, we have $2\sin 1=n\sin n$ for some $n$. Now, use the duplication formulas for $\sin$ to write $\sin n$ as $(\sin 1)\cdot P_n(\cos 1)$, where $P_n(x)$ is a polynomial of degree $n$ (this can be shown straightforwardly via induction; these polynomials are known as the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind). This yields an identity of the form $nP_n(\cos 1)-2=0$, contradicting the fact that $\cos 1$ is transcendental. In fact, this shows that no non-trivial linear relation can hold among any finite number of members of $A$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Could you at least hint at a justification of the last sentence? $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2014 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ @MannyReyes I should correct that to 'additive identity', actually (I was thinking of $A$ as a group, not a ring). The proof in that case is almost identical: use the $\sin n$ identity to write each of the terms in the form $(\sin 1)\cdot P_n(\cos 1)$, sum, and derive a contradiction. $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2014 at 17:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks, the "additive identity" helps a lot. So it seems that you're actually proving that $\{\sin(n) \mid n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ is a $\mathbb{Z}$-linearly independent subset of $\mathbb{R}$. Very nice! $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2014 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ (Note that similarly to a now-deleted answer from @MarcinŁoś, this uses the Lindemann-Weirstraß theorem to derive its conclusion - in my case, it's implicit in the assertion that $\cos 1$ is transcendental.) $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2014 at 20:39
1
$\begingroup$

There is no 1 (multiplicative identity) so it is not a ring. x sin(x) is either 0 (when x=0) or is a transcendental number due to Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem when x <> 0

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Depends on your definition of a ring. Rings are not usually required to have an identity though. $\endgroup$
    – the_fox
    Mar 5, 2014 at 17:31
  • $\begingroup$ True that is unclear from the question if they mean ring with identity or not. The other answer also assumes there is a 1 in the ring when it say there is an n such that 2 sin 1 = n sin n. Because the 2 here is an element 2 in the ring to multiply 1 sin 1 by. Hence it assumes there is a 1 in the ring to make the element 2 from. $\endgroup$ Mar 5, 2014 at 21:09
  • $\begingroup$ Now I am curious if you assume that there is not a 1 in the ring if you can still prove the statement :-) $\endgroup$ Mar 5, 2014 at 21:15
  • $\begingroup$ I think that Steven's answer tackles closure of addition, i.e. whether $1\sin 1 + 1 \sin 1 = 2\sin 1$ is an element of this set or not. $\endgroup$
    – the_fox
    Mar 6, 2014 at 1:36
  • $\begingroup$ Aha I had missed that point. Thanks for explaining! So given we are using the 1 from R here in regular way it seems like we must be assuming the ring has identity. $\endgroup$ Mar 6, 2014 at 10:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.