Discriminants and Weierstrass form of elliptic curves I'm confused by what appears to be contradictory information.  
In this post, the claim is made that 
"Every elliptic curve over $\mathbb{Q}$ can be written in the form $y^{2}= x^{3}+ax+b$ where $a,b∈ \mathbb{Z}$ with discriminant $Δ=−16(4a^{3}+27b^{2})≠0$. So the number of elliptic curves of discriminant $D$ is bounded above by number of nontrivial pairs $(a,b)∈ \mathbb{Z}^{2}$ such that $D=−16(4a^{3}+27b^{2})$."
Is this true?  this post gives an example of an elliptic curve with integer coefficients that is not isomorphic to any curve $y^2 = x^3 + Ax + B$ for $A, B$ integers and discriminant equal to the original.   Isn't this in contradiction to the original claim?  That is, the curve in the second link would not be counted as a curve with its discriminant, right?  
In fact, it seems to me (after plugging through the relevant changes of variables) that most curves of the form 
$$E: y^2 + a_{1} xy + a_{3} y = x^{3} + a_{2}x^{2} + a_{4}x + a_{6},$$ with discriminant $\Delta$
cannot be written in the form
$$ E' : y^{2} = x^{3} + Ax + B $$ with discriminant also $\Delta$ for some $A, B \in \mathbb{Z}$.  
Any help?
 A: The statement:

"The number of elliptic curves of discriminant $D$ is bounded above by
number of nontrivial pairs $(a,b)∈ \mathbb{Z}^{2}$ such that
$D=−16(4a^{3}+27b^{2})$."

is certainly false as stated. For example, the discriminant of the model for the curve $$E:y^2 + y = x^3 - x^2 - 10x - 20$$
is $-11^5$. Any model of the form $y^2=x^3+Ax+B$ with integers $A,B$ has a discriminant of the form $D=-16(4a^3+27b^2)$. But the equation
$$-11^5 = -16(4a^3+27b^2)$$
is impossible in integers $a,b$ as the left hand side is odd and the right hand side is even.
One could salvage the statement above, however, and write something in a similar spirit. Going from a generic Weierstrass model to a short Weierstrass model means that the discriminant is multiplied, at worst, by $2^{12}3^{12}$. So one could say

"The number of elliptic curves of discriminant $D$ is bounded above $n_1+n_2+n_3+n_4$, where

*

*$n_1$ is the number of non-trivial pairs $(a,b)\in\mathbb{Z}^2$ such that $D=-16(4a^3+27b^2)$,


*$n_2$ is the number of non-trivial pairs $(a,b)\in\mathbb{Z}^2$ such that $2^{12}D=-16(4a^3+27b^2)$,


*$n_3$ is the number of non-trivial pairs $(a,b)\in\mathbb{Z}^2$ such that $3^{12}D=-16(4a^3+27b^2)$, and


*$n_4$ is the number of non-trivial pairs $(a,b)\in\mathbb{Z}^2$ such that $6^{12}D=-16(4a^3+27b^2)$."

and I believe this is a true statement.
